Abstract

In the Cardenas Formation (central Mexico), a 175 m thick sedimentarysequence of Maastrichtian age was analyzed with respect to its palaeontology and sedimentology. A wide variety of lithological and palaeontological features characterize this sequence comprising unfossiliferous and fossil-bearing sand- and siltstones, and diverse rudist and coral–rudist associations in carbonate or mixed carbonate/clastic lithologies. A total of 24 rudist and coral–rudist associations are exposed in the investigated section, which are grouped into 5 limestone units. Radiolitid assemblages, coral–rudist reefs, coral-domi-nated reefs, and hippuritid-dominated reefs are present. The stacking pattern of these reef intervals indicates a general transgressive trend through the entire section. Smaller-scale facies trends could be distinguished within each limestone unit, comprising deepening-upward sequences, defined by a shoreface–calcareous algae–radiolitid–marl facies transition, and shallowing-upward sequences defined by a hippuritid–actaeonellid–coral/rudist facies transition. This cyclic sedimentation pattern is obscured by an episodic input of clastic sedimentsderived from the uplifting Sierra Madre Oriental, which in turn triggered either the development or decline of reefs.

Highlights

  • In late Cretaceous times rudist bivalves became the most important benthic carbonate producers in both the Tethyan and Caribbean realms (KAUFFMAN, 1973; ROSS & SKELTON, 1993)

  • A total of 24 rudist and coral–rudist associations are exposed in the investigated section, which are grouped into 5 limestone units

  • Smaller-scale facies trends could be distinguished within each limestone unit, comprising deepening-upward sequences, defined by a shoreface–calcareous algae–radiolitid–marl facies transition, and shallowing-upward sequences defined by a hippuritid–actaeonellid–coral/rudist facies transition

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In late Cretaceous times rudist bivalves became the most important benthic carbonate producers in both the Tethyan and Caribbean realms (KAUFFMAN, 1973; ROSS & SKELTON, 1993). They predominantly built widespread mono- to paucispecific associations but were able to co-exist successfully with corals yielding complex and diverse coral–rudist reefs (e.g., KAUFFMAN & SOHL, 1973; MASSE & PHILIP, 1981; LAVIANO, 1984; CAMOIN et al, 1988; SCOTT et al, 1990; HÖFLING, 1997; SANDERS & BARON-SZABO, 1997; SANDERS & PONS, 1999; GÖTZ, 2001, 2003; MITCHELL, 2002). We use the term “reef” in the general sense of “calcareous deposits created by essentially in place sessile organisms” (RIDING, 2002, p. 165)

GEOLOGIC SETTING AND LITHOLOGIES OF THE CARDENAS FORMATION
LITHOLOGIES OF THE INVESTIGATED SECTION
RUDISTS AND CORALS OF THE CARDENAS FORMATION
RUDIST ASSOCIATIONS WITHIN THE CARDENAS FORMATION
Radiolitid assemblages
Coral–rudist reefs
Coral-dominated reefs
Hippuritid-dominated reefs
DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE CARDENAS FORMATION
FACIES DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE SECTION
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.