Abstract

BackgroundInternational immigration to Japan, where homogeneous ethnicity is a population characteristic, has been growing. Although immigration is recognised as a risk factor for multiple mental-health related issues, there are few regional reports on foreign nationals accessing the psychiatric services in Japan. We aimed to reveal their current status and provide information to develop an optimal service system.MethodsA multicentre retrospective document review research was conducted. The subjects were foreign nationals who resided in Japan and presented at the psychiatry departments in three core regional hospitals in the Keihin region, which faces Tokyo Bay and is well known to include the largest traditional industrial zone in Japan, over a period of 3 years. We investigated the patients’ demographic and clinical information including country/region of origin, spoken language, use of a medical interpreter, pathway to hospitals and outcome.ResultsThe percentage of foreign patients among all patients (1.4%) was quite low. Their age distribution (45.8 years on average) was dissociated from the age distribution of foreign nationals who resided in Japan. Regarding the country/region of origin, China (35.1%) was the most common country, followed by the Philippines, Korea and Brazil. Several subjects (22.9%) could not speak Japanese; therefore, interpretation was required by family members/friends (17.1%) or a professional interpreter (5.4%). Neurotic and stress-related disorders were the most common diagnosis (24.4%). The proportion of psychoactive substance use was higher than that for Japanese national data as immigrants are known to be at risk for it.ConclusionsThe results suggest that foreign nationals who reside in Japan are less likely to contact appropriate services for mental illness, especially young people at relatively high risk of mental illness do not access services. Furthermore, lack of medical interpreters may impede the mental health conditions of foreign nationals. The development of a community-based integrated care system accessible to foreign nationals seems to be indispensable.

Highlights

  • International immigration to Japan, where homogeneous ethnicity is a population characteristic, has been growing

  • The Ministry of Justice of Japan reported that the number of foreign nationals who resided in Japan was over 2.82 million in 2019, accounting for 2.24% of the total population in Japan [7, 8]

  • The subjects were foreign nationals who resided in Japan and presented at the psychiatry departments of three central hospitals in the Keihin region over a three-year period from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2019

Read more

Summary

Introduction

International immigration to Japan, where homogeneous ethnicity is a population characteristic, has been growing. Immigration is recognised as a risk factor for multiple mental-health related issues, there are few regional reports on foreign nationals accessing the psychiatric services in Japan. Host countries need to accept diverse foreign nationals with economically, socially, and culturally different backgrounds [3]. Immigration to Japan, where homogeneous ethnicity is a population characteristic, has been growing in the last three decades after the reorganisation of the resident status of foreign nationals in 1990 [4, 5]. The Ministry of Justice of Japan reported that the number of foreign nationals who resided in Japan was over 2.82 million in 2019, accounting for 2.24% of the total population in Japan [7, 8]. More foreign nationals are expected to begin working stably in Japan [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.