Abstract

BackgroundDelimiting cryptic species in elasmobranchs is a major challenge in modern taxonomy due the lack of available phenotypic features. Employing stand-alone genetics in splitting a cryptic species may prove problematic for further studies and for implementing conservation management. In this study, we examined mitochondrial DNA and genome-wide nuclear single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the brown-banded bambooshark, Chiloscyllium punctatum to evaluate potential cryptic species and the species-population boundary in the group.ResultsBoth mtDNA and SNP analyses showed potential delimitation within C. punctatum from the Indo-Australian region and consisted of four operational taxonomic units (OTUs), i.e. those from Indo-Malay region, the west coast of Sumatra, Lesser Sunda region, and the Australian region. Each OTU can be interpreted differently depending on available supporting information, either based on biological, ecological or geographical data. We found that SNP data provided more robust results than mtDNA data in determining the boundary between population and cryptic species.ConclusionTo split a cryptic species complex and erect new species based purely on the results of genetic analyses is not recommended. The designation of new species needs supportive diagnostic morphological characters that allow for species recognition, as an inability to recognise individuals in the field creates difficulties for future research, management for conservation and fisheries purposes. Moreover, we recommend that future studies use a comprehensive sampling regime that encompasses the full range of a species complex. This approach would increase the likelihood of identification of operational taxonomic units rather than resulting in an incorrect designation of new species.

Highlights

  • Delimiting cryptic species in elasmobranchs is a major challenge in modern taxonomy due the lack of available phenotypic features

  • Genetic analyses from two populations of a relatively sedentary species that are separated by considerable geographical distance may show large fixed differences, supporting them being identified as separate species

  • Determining a new species based on genetic differences should be approached with caution and supported by strong justifications

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Delimiting cryptic species in elasmobranchs is a major challenge in modern taxonomy due the lack of available phenotypic features. Employing stand-alone genetics in splitting a cryptic species may prove problematic for further studies and for implementing conservation management. The development of genetic and genomic studies has substantially influenced how species are defined taxonomically, with a shift from traditional taxonomy based on morphological and biological characters to one that includes or entirely relies on DNA-evidence Advanced DNA sequencing has revealed species complexes and cryptic species previously assumed to be subspecies or populations of a single species through traditional taxonomic analysis [3,4,5]. A reliance on genetic evidence alone to split a species complex into two or more new species presents wildlife managers and ecologists with challenges as morphological features that facilitate visual discrimination are absent [12,13,14]. A lack of fieldbased identification may confound determination of a species’ conservation status, and management strategies that might be relevant for that species [6, 15, 16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.