Abstract

The method of delay estimation given in Hamon and Hannan [1] is reviewed and a modification involving autoregressive model fitting is proposed. It is shown how numerical problems associated with the optimization of the criterion used in both the original and modified procedures can be circumvented. The modified procedure and a procedure due to Chan, Riley, and Plant [2] are compared to the Hamon-Hannan procedure by simulations. For moderate to large signal-to-noise ratios, the modified Hamon-Hannan procedure appears to provide better estimates. In the case of low signal-to-noise ratios, with the smaller size, the Chan, Riley, and Plant procedure performed best.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.