Abstract
Doctors and psychologists often use ‘well-being’ and ‘quality of life’ interchangeably, with quality of health overdetermining both. Insights from virtue ethics and St. Thomas Aquinas challenge this. Well-being has a primary ‘eudaimonic’ dimension, and an accompanying ‘subjective’ dimension. The ‘eudaimonic’ consists in a virtuous way of life in which our affective, cognitive, and other capacities are developed in pursuit of worthwhile aims. The ‘subjective’ consists in attaining and enjoying the goods necessary and fitting to a full human life. Does health — extended to include mental and physical health — account for the ‘eudaimonic’? The result would problematically collapse ethics into medicine, and well-being into health. Rather, it is argued that health is a ‘subjective’ and not an ‘eudaimonic’ good, and that to a significant degree eudaimonic well-being can persist amid ill-health. Attending to the eudaimonic dimension helps us to overcome characteristic gaps in ‘quality of life’ discourse.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
