"Defining the Drip: A Systematic Review of Incontinence Definitions and Predictors Following HoLEP".

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate with Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Based on a 2-Year Followup

Transurethral Holmium Laser Enucleation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Simple Open Prostatectomy—Which Procedure is Faster?

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Long-Term Durability of Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rates During 10 Years of Followup

Is There a Way to Predict Stress Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate?

HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION VERSUS TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE: RESULTS FROM A 2-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a size-independent treatment option for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. HoLEP has been shown to have excellent improvements in prostate symptom scores and maximum flow rates that have been durable for 2 decades. However, the steep learning curve associated with HoLEP has prevented its widespread adoption. New advancements in lasers, specifically the Moses™ pulse-modulation technology, have resulted in improvements in hemostasis and achieving same-day discharges and catheter removals. We aimed to perform a cost-comparison to analyze if Moses-augmented HoLEP (m-HoLEP) resulted in cost-savings. A retrospective review was performed of a single expert surgeon's experience from May 2018 to November 2020, comparing m-HoLEP with HoLEP. Perioperative and postoperative variables were abstracted from the medical record. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using SAS® 9.4. Two-sided significance was set at p <0.05. A total of 312 men underwent HoLEP during the study period (192 in m-HoLEP group and 120 in HoLEP group). The m-HoLEP group had more same-day discharges (p <0.001) and emergency department visits (6.3% vs 1.7%, p=0.0071). m-HoLEP resulted in hospital cost savings of $840 for the initial surgical episode (p=0.0297). When factoring in emergency department visits/readmissions, the cost savings decreased to $747 per case (p=0.0574). m-HoLEP was associated with same-day discharge and hospital cost savings of $840 for the initial surgical episode. Further study in other institutions with surgeons of varying experience levels will need to be performed to see if these findings can be replicated.

To evaluate short-term outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and chronic urinary retention (CUR). A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with CUR who underwent HoLEP or PVP at our institution over a 3-year period. CUR was defined as a persistent post-void residual urine volume (PVR) of >300 mL or refractory urinary retention requiring catheterisation. We identified 72 patients with CUR who underwent HoLEP and 31 who underwent PVP. Preoperative parameters including median catheterisation duration (3 vs 5 months, P = 0.71), American Urological Association Symptom Index score (AUASI; 18 vs 21, P = 0.24), and PVR (555 vs 473 mL, P = 0.096) were similar between the HoLEP and PVP groups. The HoLEP group had a larger prostate volume (88.5 vs 49 mL, P < 0.001) and higher PSA concentration (4.5 vs 2.4 ng/mL, P = 0.001). At median 6-month follow-up, 71 (99%) HoLEP patients and 23 (74%) PVP patients were catheter-free (P < 0.001). Of the voiding patients, postoperative AUASI (3 vs 4, P = 0.06), maximum urinary flow rate (23 vs 18 mL/s, P = 0.28) and PVR (56.5 vs 54 mL, P = 1.0) were improved in both groups. Both HoLEP and PVP are effective at improving urinary parameters in men with CUR. Despite larger prostate volumes, HoLEP had a 99% successful deobstruction rate, thus rendering patients catheter-free.

Holmium Laser Enucleation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: 3-Year Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

This retrospective study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and transurethral vaporization techniques between the elderly and nonelderly patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from two regional centers that used HoLEP and transurethral vaporization techniques for BPE treatment. The study population consisted of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, divided into elderly and nonelderly groups. Total 477 of 872 patients remained in the study, of which 198 were classified as elderly (age ≥ 75 years) and 279 as non-elderly (age < 75 years). The postoperative decrease in IPSS was significantly lower in the elderly group, and advanced age was associated with less IPSS decline only after vaporization (p = 0.003) but not after HoLEP. In both surgeries, the duration of postoperative catheterization was significantly longer in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group, and hemoglobin drop at 1 day postoperatively showed no age-related difference. The most common complication after HoLEP was intermittent incontinence, which was more frequent in the elderly group (15.0%) than in the non-elderly group (6.2%, p = 0.038). Regardless of age, the overall rate of need for medication at 6 months postoperatively was significantly higher after HoLEP (32/190, 16.8%) than after transurethral vaporization (30/287, 10.5%) (p = 0.042). The need for medication was higher in the elderly for both HoLEP and vaporization than in the non-elderly group with a specific cutoff of age. Elderly patients with BPE had relatively worse surgical outcomes, including a higher need for postoperative medications and prolonged catheterization. HoLEP demonstrated a reduction in IPSS regardless of age, and transurethral vaporization did not, although it was associated with a higher rate of intermittent incontinence.

This study aimed to investigate the real experience and specific needs of patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, to provide appropriate nursing strategies for reference in the perioperative management of patients undergoing this type of surgery. The descriptive phenomenological research method in qualitative research was selected for this study. Purposive sampling method was used to select 10 patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from May to June 2023 for semi-structured interviews, and the results of the interviews were compiled and analyzed using the Colaizzi seven-step analysis method. The surgical process experience and needs of patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate were summarized and organized into three major themes and eight minor themes: (i) overall perception of the preoperative surgical process (unexpected admission experience, uncertain preoperative waiting time, and inadequate preoperative informational support), (ii) complex intraoperative sensory experience (unfamiliar surgical staff, cold surgical environment, and noisy surgical sounds), and (iii) postoperative continuity of care needs (diverse forms of health education, personalized health education content). These findings recommend to strengthen preoperative education to enhance patients’ cognitive preparedness, to improve intraoperative care by addressing complex environmental stimuli through humanistic nursing, and to provide diverse health education that supports continuity of care throughout the perioperative process. This will further improve the hospitalization experience of patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, meet practical needs, and provide a valuable reference for perioperative comfort management and nursing strategy development for this group of patients undergoing HoLEP.

To evaluate, in a prospective study, the complications in 280 patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) at our institution, and to review previous reports to determine the overall incidence and types of various complications, and analyse their causes and means of prevention. We analysed the patients' demographic, peri-operative and follow-up data, and the complications during and after surgery. HoLEP was completed successfully in 268 patients (95.7%); eight required conversion to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) during the initial experience. The morcellation device and laser malfunctioned in two patients each. A blood transfusion was required during HoLEP in one patient; other complications included capsular perforation (9.6%), superficial bladder mucosal injury (3.9%) and ureteric orifice injury (2.1%). A blood transfusion was needed after HoLEP in 1.4% of patients and cystoscopy with clot evacuation in 0.7%. Transient urinary incontinence was the commonest complication after HoLEP, in 10.7% of patients, but recovered spontaneously in all except two (0.7%). Other rare complications were re-catheterization (3.9%), urinary tract infection (3.2%), epididymitis (0.7%), meatal and submeatal stenosis (2.5%), bulbar urethral stricture (2.1%), bladder neck contracture (0.35%) and myocardial infarction (0.35%). There was a low incidence of complications with HoLEP; most were minor and easily managed. Our results are comparable with those published previously, and establish HoLEP as safe and reproducible procedure. While gaining experience, HoLEP can be converted to TURP with no harm to the patient.

PurposeCurrently, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are the standard surgical procedures used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Several recent studies have demonstrated that the surgical management of BPH in patients with detrusor underactivity (DU) can effectively improve voiding symptoms, but comparative data on the efficacy of HoLEP and TURP are insufficient. Therefore, we compared the short-term surgical outcomes of HoLEP and TURP in patients with DU.MethodsFrom January 2010 to May 2015, 352 patients underwent HoLEP or TURP in procedures performed by a single surgeon. Of these patients, 56 patients with both BPH and DU were enrolled in this study (HoLEP, n=24; TURP, n=32). Surgical outcomes were retrospectively compared between the 2 groups. DU was defined as a detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate of <40 cm H2O as measured by a pressure flow study.ResultsThe preoperative characteristics of patients and the presence of comorbidities were comparable between the 2 groups. The TURP group showed a significantly shorter operative time than the HoLEP group (P=0.033). The weight of the resected prostate was greater in the HoLEP group, and postoperative voiding parameters, including peak flow rate and postvoid residual urine volume were significantly better in the HoLEP group than in the TURP group.ConclusionsHoLEP can be effectively and safely performed in patients with DU and can be expected to have better surgical outcomes than TURP in terms of the improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms.

Same Day Discharge is a Successful Approach for the Majority of Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) represents a great potential alternative technique to standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We present 12-month follow up results of a randomized clinical trial, comparing HoLEP with TURP. A total of 40 patients with BPH and prostate volume < 50 g, have been randomized for HoLEP (n = 20) or TURP (n = 20). Urinary tract ultrasound with postvoid residual urine (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Single Question Quality of Life (QoL) Score were evaluated preoperatively and during the follow-up period at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo postoperatively. Intra- and perioperative data as well as early and late complications were assessed. Operative time was longer in the HoLEP group (p < 0.001); catheterisation time (p < 0.05) and hospital stay (p < 0.05) shorter. Hemoglobin levels drop (p < 0.001) was higher in the TURp group. Early and late postoperative complications were more frequent in the TURp group (p < 0.001). Follow-up data favored the HoLEP group, both regarding IPSS at 6-month (p < 0.05) and 12-month (p < 0.01), and single question QoL score, at 6-month (p < 0.01) and 12-month (p < 0.05). PVR was lower in the HoLEP group at 6-month (p < 0.01). HoLEP demonstrates superiority to TURp in regards to perioperative parameters and follow-up data and has a great potential to become the new gold standard in the surgical treatment of BPH.

IntroductionInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated outcome measure for the evaluation of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). When treating patients with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), patient selection is key to achieve the best clinical outcome. Therefore, we analyzed how the severity of LUTS as determined by IPSS influenced postoperative functional outcomes.Material and methodsWe conducted a retrospective, matched-pair analysis of 2,011 men who underwent HoLEP or TURP for LUTS/BPO between 2013–2017. We included 195 patients in the final analysis (HoLEP n = 97; TURP n = 98), who were matched for prostate size (50 cc), age, and body mass index. Patients were then stratified by IPSS. Groups were compared for perioperative parameters, safety and short-term functional outcomes.ResultsWhile preoperative symptom severity was a significant predictor of postoperative clinical improvement, patients who received HoLEP showed superior postoperative functional results with higher peak flow rates and 2-fold greater improvement in IPSS. In patients presenting with severe symptoms, we observed 3- to 4-fold less Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II and overall complications after receiving HoLEP compared to TURP.ConclusionsPatients with severe LUTS were more likely to experience clinically significant improvement after surgery than patients with moderate LUTS, and HoLEP showed superior functional outcomes than TURP. However, patients with moderate LUTS should not be denied surgery, but may warrant a more comprehensive clinical work-up.