Abstract

IntroductionSpirometry, a pulmonary function test, is being increasingly applied across healthcare tiers, particularly in primary care settings. According to the guidelines set by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), identifying normal, obstructive, restrictive, and mixed ventilatory patterns requires spirometry and lung volume assessments. The aim of the present study was to explore the accuracy of deep learning-based analytic models based on flow–volume curves in identifying the ventilatory patterns. Further, the performance of the best model was compared with that of physicians working in lung function laboratories.MethodsThe gold standard for identifying ventilatory patterns was the rules of ATS/ERS guidelines. One physician chosen from each hospital evaluated the ventilatory patterns according to the international guidelines. Ten deep learning models (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet18_vd, ResNet34_vd, ResNet50_vd, ResNet50_vc, SE_ResNet18_vd, VGG11, VGG13, and VGG16) were developed to identify patterns from the flow–volume curves. The patterns obtained by the best-performing model were cross-checked with those obtained by the physicians.ResultsA total of 18,909 subjects were used to develop the models. The ratio of the training, validation, and test sets of the models was 7:2:1. On the test set, the best-performing model VGG13 exhibited an accuracy of 95.6%. Ninety physicians independently interpreted 100 other cases. The average accuracy achieved by the physicians was 76.9 ± 18.4% (interquartile range: 70.5–88.5%) with a moderate agreement (κ = 0.46), physicians from primary care settings achieved a lower accuracy (56.2%), while the VGG13 model accurately identified the ventilatory pattern in 92.0% of the 100 cases (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe VGG13 model identified ventilatory patterns with a high accuracy using the flow–volume curves without requiring any other parameter. The model can assist physicians, particularly those in primary care settings, in minimizing errors and variations in ventilatory patterns.

Highlights

  • Spirometry, a pulmonary function test, is being increasingly applied across healthcare tiers, in primary care settings

  • The average accuracy achieved by the physicians was 76.9 ± 18.4% with a moderate agreement (κ = 0.46), physicians from primary care settings achieved a lower accuracy (56.2%), while the VGG13 model accurately identified the ventilatory pattern in 92.0% of the 100 cases (P < 0.0001)

  • According to the guidelines set by the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS), a trained technician performs spirometry and a lung volume test to identify the ventilatory patterns as normal, obstructive, restrictive, or mixed patterns in consultation with a pulmonologist (Pellegrino et al, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spirometry, a pulmonary function test, is being increasingly applied across healthcare tiers, in primary care settings. According to the guidelines set by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), identifying normal, obstructive, restrictive, and mixed ventilatory patterns requires spirometry and lung volume assessments. According to the guidelines set by the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS), a trained technician performs spirometry and a lung volume test to identify the ventilatory patterns as normal, obstructive, restrictive, or mixed patterns in consultation with a pulmonologist (Pellegrino et al, 2005). Chronic respiratory diseases pose a threat to the Chinese population Despite this knowledge, the use of PFTs is limited (Zhong et al, 2007; Wang et al, 2018; Huang et al, 2019). Fast and accurate interpretation of spirometry results is crucial in primary care settings, and novel interpretation approaches for ventilatory patterns are warranted

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.