Abstract
AbstractWe present various results regarding the decidability of certain sets of sentences by Simple Type Theory (). First, we introduce the notion of decreasing sentence, and prove that the set of decreasing sentences is undecidable by Simple Type Theory with infinitely many zero‐type elements (); a result that follows directly from the fact that every sentence is equivalent to a decreasing sentence. We then establish two different positive decidability results for a weak subtheory of . Namely, the decidability of (a subset of Σ1) and (the set of all sentences , where φ is strictly decreasing). Finally, we present some consequences for the set of existential‐universal sentences. All the above results have direct implications for Quine's theory of “New Foundations” () and its weak subtheory .
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
