Decreasing opioid provision and use while maintaining analgesia efficacy in cervical preparation with osmotic dilators before dilation and evacuation: A quality improvement initiative.

Abortion during the second trimester of pregnancy accounts for 10-15% of abortions performed worldwide. Dilation and evacuation (D&E) is the preferred method of second-trimester abortion in most parts of the developed world. Cervical preparation is recommended for dilation and curettage (D&C) after 12 weeks gestation and is standard practice for D&E beyond 14 weeks gestation. Prostaglandins, osmotic dilators, and Foley balloon catheters have been used and studied as cervical preparation prior to second-trimester D&E. However, no consensus exists as to which cervical preparation method is superior with regards to safety, procedure time, need for additional dilation, ability to perform the procedure, or patient and provider acceptability. Despite the fact that the advent of osmotic dilation has improved the safety of the D&E procedure during the second trimester, it is unclear whether a certain type of osmotic dilator is superior to another or whether osmotic dilation with adjuvant prostaglandin is superior to osmotic dilation alone or to prostaglandins alone. This review evaluates cervical preparation methods for second-trimester surgical abortion with respect to differences in procedure time, dilation achieved, need for additional dilation, complications, ability to complete the procedure, patient pain scores, and patient and provider acceptability and satisfaction. We searched for trials of cervical preparation prior to second-trimester D&E. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared osmotic, mechanical, antiprogesterone, prostaglandin, or other medical agents of cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion from 14-24 weeks of gestation. Data were abstracted by two authors and data entry was verified by a third author. Mean difference and Peto Odds Ratio were calculated. Osmotic dilators were found to be superior to prostaglandins with respect to cervical dilation throughout the second trimester and with respect to procedure time within the early second trimester. Addition of prostaglandins to osmotic dilators was not found to increase cervical dilation, except after 19 weeks gestation, however, no impact was seen on procedure time. Addition of Mifepristone to misoprostol was found to improve cervical dilation, yet increase procedure time and frequency of pre-procedural expulsions. Two-day cervical preparation was found to produce greater cervical preparation than one-day, but had no impact on procedure time. Serious complication rates or ability to complete the procedure did not differ significantly between any of the preparation methods reviewed. Cervical preparation with osmotic dilators and/or misoprostol before second-trimester D&E is safe and effective. Osmotic dilators appear to provide superior cervical dilation when compared to prostaglandins alone or when combined with prostaglandins, however this difference in cervical dilation does not appear to result in differences in procedure time or complication rates. There does not appear to be clear clinical benefit from two days of cervical preparation compared to one-day prior to second-trimester D&E below 19 weeks gestational duration. Mifepristone plus misoprostol was associated with high rates of pre-procedural expulsions and does not appear to be a useful method of cervical preparation before second-trimester dilation and evacuation. Same-day procedures appear to be a safe and reasonable option in the early second trimester, however, more research is needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of same-day procedures in the later second trimester.

It has been hypothesized that combinations of analgesics with different mechanisms of action may reduce or even prevent postoperative pain. We, therefore, investigated the analgesic effect of gabapentin, dexamethasone and low-dose ketamine in combination with paracetamol and ketorolac as compared with paracetamol and ketorolac alone after hip arthroplasty. In this double-blind study, 42 patients were randomly assigned to either a combination group [gabapentin 1200 mg+dexamethasone 8 mg+ketamine (0.15 mg kg(-1))+paracetamol 1 g+ketorolac 15 mg] or a control group (placebo+paracetamol 1 g+ketorolac 15 mg). The medication was given preoperatively except for ketorolac, which was given at the end of surgery. Postoperative pain treatment was paracetamol 1 gx3; ketorolac 15 mgx3; and patient-controlled intravenous morphine. Morphine consumption, pain intensity at rest and during mobilization, nausea and vomiting, sedation, dizziness, hallucination and consumption of ondansetron were recorded 2, 4 and 24 h after operation. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Morphine consumption was not significantly different between groups (P=0.085). Overall pain scores were improved in the combination group as compared with the control group both at rest (P=0.042) and during mobilization (P=0.027). In the combination group, individual pain score above 30 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale was almost eliminated. The incidence of side effects did not differ between the groups. Preoperative gabapentin, dexamethasone and ketamine combined with paracetamol and ketorolac reduced overall pain scores in patients after hip arthroplasty as compared with paracetamol and ketorolac alone. Morphine consumption was not reduced.

To evaluate the effects of eliminating the routine use of oral opioids for postcesarean delivery analgesia on postcesarean opioid consumption. At a tertiary care center, we implemented a quality improvement intervention among faculty practice patients undergoing cesarean delivery, which consisted of 1) eliminating routine ordering of oral opioids after cesarean delivery, 2) implementing guidelines for ordering a short course of opioids when deemed necessary, and 3) coupling opioid prescribing at discharge to patterns of opioid use in-hospital combined with shared decision-making. All patients, both before and after the intervention, were administered neuraxial opioids and scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications in the absence of contraindications. The primary outcome was the percentage of women who used any opioids postoperatively in-hospital. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of women discharged with a prescription for opioids, the quantity of opioids used in-hospital, pain scores, satisfaction, opioid-related side effects, and opioid prescriptions ordered in the 6 weeks after delivery. The effects of this intervention were assessed based on a chart review of patient data and a survey of patients in the 12 weeks before and 12 weeks after the intervention. We evaluated the records of 191 postcesarean delivery patients before and 181 after the intervention. Less than half of women used oral opioids in-hospital after the intervention, 82 (45%) compared with 130 (68%) before (P<.001). However, there was no change in pain scores or overall satisfaction with pain relief. Postintervention, only 40% of patients were discharged with prescriptions for opioids compared with 91% of patients before the intervention (P<.001). Eliminating routine ordering of oral opioids after cesarean delivery is associated with a significant decrease in opioid consumption while maintaining the same levels of pain control and patient satisfaction. Oral opioids are not needed by a large proportion of women after cesarean delivery.

Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate pain following overnight osmotic cervical dilator placement for second trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E). Methods A retrospective cohort study surveyed pain and quantified prescription opioid use among 100 women who underwent overnight osmotic cervical dilator placement for D&E. Participants were given opioid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) prescriptions and were asked to rate their level of pain on a Likert scale (1–10). Demographic and medical information was abstracted from electronic medical records. Bivariate analyses of demographic and clinical characteristics by pain score and opioid use were conducted. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed for pain score. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted for factors associated with opioid use. Results Gestational age ranged from 14 to 23 weeks (average 19 ± 3 weeks). The mean score of worst pain experienced was 5.3 out of 10. Participants reported 3.4 h of moderate pain (4–6 out of 10) and 1.0 h of severe pain (7–10 out of 10); 54% of women took at least one opioid (mean 2.8 ± 1.5). Multivariate analysis showed that higher pain was associated with younger age (p = .0363) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = .0296). The number of osmotic cervical dilators was associated with pain in the bivariate analysis (r = 0.216, p = .0311) but was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = .0634). An increasing number of cervical dilators (p = .0323) and a higher pain score (p = .004) were associated with opioid use. Conclusion Most participants with overnight cervical dilators for D&E experienced at least moderate pain and used opioid pain medication in addition to NSAIDs when available. A shared decision-making model may be appropriate for determining which patients may benefit from opioids.

Association between Acute Pain Scores in Children with Sickle Cell Disease and Emergency Department Disposition and Return Visit Rates

This systematic review synthesizes evidence on patient-reported outpatient opioid analgesic use after surgery. We searched PubMed (February 2019) and Web of Science and Embase (June 2019) for U.S. studies describing patient-reported outpatient opioid analgesic use. Two reviewers extracted data on opioid analgesic use, standardized the data on use , and performed independent quality appraisals based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Ninety-six studies met the eligibility criteria; 56 had sufficient information to standardize use in oxycodone 5-mg tablets. Patient-reported opioid analgesic use varied widely by procedure type; knee and hip arthroplasty had the highest postoperative opioid use, and use after many procedures was reported as <5 tablets. In studies that examined excess tablets, 25-98% of the total tablets prescribed were reported to be excess, with most studies reporting that 50-70% of tablets went unused. Factors commonly associated with higher opioid analgesic use included preoperative opioid analgesic use, higher inpatient opioid analgesic use, higher postoperative pain scores, and chronic medical conditions, among others. Estimates also varied across studies because of heterogeneity in study design, including length of follow-up and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Self-reported postsurgery outpatient opioid analgesic use varies widely both across procedures and within a given procedure type. Contributors to within-procedure variation included patient characteristics, prior opioid use, intraoperative and perioperative factors, and differences in the timing of opioid use data collection. We provide recommendations to help minimize variation caused by study design factors and maximize interpretability of forthcoming studies for use in clinical guidelines and decision-making.

Laminaria versus Dilapan osmotic cervical dilators for outpatient dilation and evacuation abortion: Randomized cohort comparison of 1001 patients

Treatment of refractory post-dural puncture headache with low doses of the strong opioid piritramide

Wound Infiltration With Extended-Release Versus Short-Acting Bupivacaine Before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective Evaluation of Surgical and Anesthetic Technique of Carpal Tunnel Release in an Orthopedic Practice

Persistent opioid and benzodiazepine use after radical cystectomy in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) patients

Patient-reported outcomes following radiofrequency ablation of the hip: a retrospective study

Commentary: The dose makes the poison: A look at opioid-free analgesia

To compare the efficacy and acceptability of buccal misoprostol or a synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for cervical preparation before same-day late first-trimester and early second-trimester surgical abortion. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared 400 micrograms of buccal misoprostol with one synthetic osmotic cervical dilator administered 3-4 hours before surgical abortion among women at 12-15 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was mean cervical circumferential dilation at the time of surgery. Randomization was stratified by parity and sample size calculated to detect a 3-French difference between groups with 90% power with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary outcomes included ease of further mechanical dilation, procedure time, complications, ripening and procedural pain, and participants' satisfaction. One hundred twenty-five women were randomized with a mean gestational age of 13 3/7 weeks. Treatment with the synthetic osmotic dilator and buccal misoprostol resulted in similar preoperative dilation (mean French 33.9 compared with 32.1, P=.065). Procedure time, procedural pain, number of complications, and participants' satisfaction and preferences did not differ between treatment groups. Misoprostol participants experienced more pain during ripening (P=.008). All but six participants, three in each arm, required mechanical dilation at the time of the procedure. This manual dilation was subjectively easier in participants who received the synthetic osmotic cervical dilator (P=.015). All participants were able to have their procedure in 1 day without further cervical preparation. Either buccal misoprostol or a synthetic osmotic cervical dilator provides adequate dilation for same-day late first-trimester and early second-trimester abortion. Despite more pain with misoprostol, patient satisfaction with misoprostol and the synthetic dilator is similar. www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00835731. I.