Abstract

Simple SummaryActive communication between GBM cells and tumor-infiltrating immune components contributes to establishing an immunosuppressive environment where T cells are scarce and exhausted. This condition is particularly exacerbated upon recurrence, which is almost inevitable for GBM patients. Immunotherapeutic approaches, including checkpoint inhibitors, have demonstrated limited efficacy and failed to prolong survival or recurrent GBM patients. Nevertheless, many studies have shown that T cell priming is possible in the GBM microenvironment, and that T cell exhaustion or dysfunction can be reprogrammed. We will revisit data from the literature and report original results obtained from recurrent GBM patients treated with dendritic cells to demonstrate the role of the microenvironment in predicting immunotherapy response and influencing decisions for personalized therapies.The interpretation of the presence and function of immune infiltration in glioblastoma (GBM) is still debated. Over the years, GBM has been considered a cold tumor that is less infiltrated by effector cells and characterized by a high proportion of immunosuppressive innate immune cells, including GBM-associated microglia/macrophages (GAMs). In this context, the failure of checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in recurrent GBM (rGBM), caused us to look beyond the clinical results and consider the point of view of immune cells. The tumor microenvironment in rGBM can be particularly hostile, even when exposed to standard immunomodulatory therapies, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), when present, are either dysfunctional or terminally exhausted. However, after checkpoint blockade therapy, it was possible to observe specific recruitment of adaptive immune cells and an efficient systemic immune response. In this review article, we attempt to address current knowledge regarding the tumor and immune microenvironment in rGBM. Furthermore, immunosuppression induced by GAMs and TIL dysfunction was revisited to account for genetic defects that can determine resistance to therapies and manipulate the immune microenvironment upon recurrence. Accordingly, we reevaluated the microenvironment of some of our rGBM patients treated with dendritic cell immunotherapy, with the goal of identifying predictive immune indicators of better treatment response.

Highlights

  • In 2002, Erick Holland described glioblastoma multiforme as “the most aggressive of the gliomas” and colloquially defined it as “the terminator” [1]

  • Immunosuppression induced by GBM-associated microglia/macrophages (GAMs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) dysfunction was revisited to account for genetic defects that can determine resistance to therapies and manipulate the immune microenvironment upon recurrence

  • Natural killer (NK) cells showed high infiltration ability, as supported by the increased numbers of cells with CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) expression but low interferon (IFN)γ levels, indicating poor cytolytic activity. These analyses describe a weak T cell compartment characterized by impaired antitumor effector ability, and no differences were revealed between primary GBM and recurrent GBM (rGBM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2002, Erick Holland described glioblastoma multiforme (glioblastoma, GBM) as “the most aggressive of the gliomas” and colloquially defined it as “the terminator” [1]. We believe that even in cases of failure, it is necessary to reflect on the survival of patients, which is considered the primary endpoint in the vast majority of the clinical studies, and the immunological data to understand more thoroughly what the gaps in treatment are and how to address them These considerations may help to improve the approaches that require the involvement of the immune system. The microenvironment of ovarian cancer [12] and prostate cancer bone metastases [13] was dissected using single-cell sequencing technologies, demonstrating the presence of monocytes and immature macrophages or inflammatory monocytes and M2 macrophages, respectively In both cases, these immunosuppressive components can influence the T cell composition and dysfunction. The immune contexture, which characterizes density, composition, and functional state of immune cells within the microenvironment, could be considered a clear indicator of the immunotherapy resistance or efficacy, addressing clinical decisions for further personalized therapies

Changes in the Microenvironment upon Recurrence
Immunotherapy Is Unsuccessful When Exhausted TILs Are Not Reinvigorated
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.