Abstract
With the rapid increase in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), ensuring the safety of airspace operations and promoting sustainable development of airspace systems have become paramount concerns. However, research dedicated to investigating the population exposure risks of UAV operations in urban areas and their spatial pattern is still missing. To address this gap, this study evenly divides the urban space into uniform grids and calculates critical areas for two UAV types within each grid. By integrating geospatial data, including buildings, land use, and population, data-driven risk maps are constructed to assess the spatial distribution patterns and potential population exposure risks of two UAV types and compare them with commonly used census units. The results indicate that the mean time between failures (MTBF) for the selected generic and rotary-type UAVs can be up to 9.04 × 108 h and 1.22 × 108 h, respectively, at acceptable risk levels, considering uncertainties. The spatial pattern of population exposure risk exhibits spatial heterogeneity and multi-scale effects in urban areas, aligning with population distribution. High-risk areas concentrate in regions characterized by high population mobility, such as transport hubs, commercial service areas, residential zones, and business districts. Additionally, the comparation emphasizes the potential bias introduced by using census units in risk assessment, especially in regions with significant urban build-up. This framework enables the evaluation of safety and acceptability across diverse urban land use areas and offers guidance for airspace management in megacities, ensuring the safe integration of UAVs in urban environments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.