Abstract

<div>Abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b> Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), a telomerase-independent telomere maintenance mechanism, is strongly associated with ATRX and DAXX alterations and occurs frequently in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET).</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> In a Korean cohort of 269 surgically resected primary PanNETs and 19 sporadic microadenomas, ALT status and nuclear ATRX and DAXX protein expression were assessed and compared with clinicopathologic factors.</p><p><b>Results:</b> In PanNETs, ALT or loss of ATRX/DAXX nuclear expression was observed in 20.8% and 19.3%, respectively, whereas microadenomas were not altered. ALT-positive PanNETs displayed a significantly higher grade, size, and pT classification (all, <i>P</i> < 0.001). ALT also strongly correlated with lymphovascular (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and perineural invasion (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and the presence of lymph node (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and distant metastases (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Furthermore, patients with ALT-positive primary PanNETs had a shorter recurrence-free survival [HR = 3.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.83–6.27; <i>P</i> < 0.001]. Interestingly, when limiting to patients with distant metastases, those with ALT-positive primary tumors had significantly better overall survival (HR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08–0.68; <i>P</i> = 0.008). Similarly, tumors with loss of ATRX/DAXX expression were significantly associated with ALT (<i>P</i> < 0.001), aggressive clinical behavior, and reduced recurrence-free survival (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, similar to ALT, when limiting to patients with distant metastases, loss of ATRX/DAXX expression was associated with better overall survival (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both primary ALT-positive and ATRX/DAXX-negative PanNETs are independently associated with aggressive clinicopathologic behavior and displayed reduced recurrence-free survival. In contrast, ALT activation and loss of ATRX/DAXX are both associated with better overall survival in patients with metastases. Therefore, these biomarkers may be used as prognostic markers depending on the context of the disease. <i>Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1598–606. ©2016 AACR</i>.</p></div>

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.