Abstract

Dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies are prime targets for present and future gamma-ray telescopes hunting for indirect signals of particle dark matter. The interpretation of the data requires careful assessment of their dark matter content in order to derive robust constraints on candidate relic particles. Here, we use an optimised spherical Jeans analysis to reconstruct the `astrophysical factor' for both annihilating and decaying dark matter in 21 known dSphs. Improvements with respect to previous works are: (i) the use of more flexible luminosity and anisotropy profiles to minimise biases, (ii) the use of weak priors tailored on extensive sets of contamination-free mock data to improve the confidence intervals, (iii) systematic cross-checks of binned and unbinned analyses on mock and real data, and (iv) the use of mock data including stellar contamination to test the impact on reconstructed signals. Our analysis provides updated values for the dark matter content of 8 `classical' and 13 `ultrafaint' dSphs, with the quoted uncertainties directly linked to the sample size; the more flexible parametrisation we use results in changes compared to previous calculations. This translates into our ranking of potentially-brightest and most robust targets---viz., Ursa Minor, Draco, Sculptor---, and of the more promising, but uncertain targets---viz., Ursa Major 2, Coma---for annihilating dark matter. Our analysis of Segue 1 is extremely sensitive to whether we include or exclude a few marginal member stars, making this target one of the most uncertain. Our analysis illustrates challenges that will need to be addressed when inferring the dark matter content of new `ultrafaint' satellites that are beginning to be discovered in southern sky surveys.

Highlights

  • Constraining particle candidates for dark matter (DM) through indirect searches for their annihilations or decays has a long history (Gunn et al 1978; Stecker 1978; for a recent review see Bergstrom 2012)

  • For each ‘ultrafaint’ satellite, we identify possible members as red giant branch (RGB) candidates, which we define as point sources whose g − r colours place them within 0.25 dex of the Dartmouth isochrone (Dotter et al 2008) calculated for a stellar population with age 12 Gyr, metallicity corresponding to the mean value estimated from spectroscopy, and shifted by the distance modulus estimated for that satellite (McConnachie 2012)

  • Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis described in the previous Section, we fit the velocity data of the 8 ‘classical’ and of 13 ‘ultrafaint’ dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies with the 7 parameters (3 parameters for the Einasto DM profile and 4 for the Baes & Van Hese velocity anisotropy) required in our Jeans analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Constraining particle candidates for dark matter (DM) through indirect searches for their annihilations or decays has a long history (Gunn et al 1978; Stecker 1978; for a recent review see Bergstrom 2012). Observations of several dSphs by the Fermi-LAT satellite (GeringerSameth, Koushiappas & Walker 2014; Fermi-LAT Collaboration 2014, 2015) provide the most stringent constraint to date with σv < 3 × 10−26 cm s−1 (95% CL) for dark matter particles with a mass below 100 GeV annihilating into the bb channel. As this is of the order of the thermally-averaged annihilation cross section required for a weakly interacting massive particle to make up the dark matter, it has become imperative to scrutinise these constraints closely. An understanding of Reticulum II’s DM content will be crucial for determining whether this interpretation of the γ-ray signal is compatible with non-detections in other dSphs

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.