Abstract
We performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a Lennard-Jones system and investigated the effect of potential cutoff in the Nose–Poincare and Nose–Hoover thermostats. The Nose–Poincare thermostat is the symplectic algorithm of the Nose thermostat, while the Nose–Hoover thermostat is not a symplectic algorithm. If the potential energy is twice or more differentiable, the Hamiltonian was conserved well in the Nose–Poincare thermostat. If the potential energy is once or less differentiable, however, the Hamiltonian was not conserved, but increased because the continuity of potential energy is required in a symplectic MD simulation. The increase in the Hamiltonian caused the increase in instantaneous temperature, and physical quantities cannot be obtained correctly. It is because the difference in the Hamiltonian effectively increases the set temperature in the equations of motion. On the other hand, the Hamiltonian was not conserved for any cutoff method in the Nose–Hoover thermostat because it is not ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.