Abstract
We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. A custom algorithm was developed to automatically extract GCIPL thickness measurements from locations corresponding to Humphrey Field Analyser 10-2 and 30-2 test grids over Goldmann II, III and V stimulus sizes from a healthy cohort of 478 participants. Differences between GCIPL thickness measurements based on VF test grids (VF-based paradigms) and the 8 × 8 grid, as per instrument review software, were analyzed, as were impacts of fovea to optic disc tilt and areas over which GCIPL thickness measurements were extracted. Significant differences between the VF-based paradigms and the 8 × 8 grid were observed at up to 55% of locations across the macula, with the greatest deviations at the fovea (median 25.5 μm, 95% CI 25.24–25.72 μm, P < .0001). While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°–8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. As such, standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Spatial direction of GCIPL thickness measurements will improve future comparisons of structure and function, thereby improving methods designed to detect pathology affecting the inner retina.
Highlights
We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids
Algorithm validation was performed by comparing GCIPL thickness measurements extracted using the novel algorithm and OCT review software over identical measurement locations
Our findings clearly indicate that the 8 × 8 grid inappropriately pools locations showing distinct variations in GCIPL thickness, despite its high sampling density (Fig. 4), and does not adequately represent the retinal locations sampled during VF testing, even in a normative cohort where, compared to a cohort with pathology, we would expect greater variability in GCIPL thickness values
Summary
We aimed to evaluate methods of extracting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements over retinal locations corresponding to standard visual field (VF) test grids. While significant correlations with fovea to optic disc tilt were noted at up to 33% of locations distributed 6°–8° from the foveal center, there were no marked differences in GCIPL thickness measurements between VF-based paradigms using different stimulus sizes. Standard high-density OCT measurement paradigms do not adequately reflect GCIPL measurements at retinal locations tested with standard VF patterns, with the central macular region contributing most to the observed differences and with further correction required for fovea to optic disc tilt. Averaged foveal inner retinal measurements commonly include the GC-poor foveal pit, and as a result do not adequately reflect the GC-rich locations directly adjacent to the foveal pit[6, 13] that constitute the primary retinal loci contributing to high foveal VF sensitivities[14, 15]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
