Abstract

The chasm between the “ivory tower” of the academic world and the lived experience of the K-12 classroom has always been a subject of discussion, but probably no phenomenon has caused more debate on this issue than the reconceptualization of curriculum studies. One interpretation put forth by curriculum theorists is that the reconceptualization developed around a moral void, thereby freeing a constellation of academic discourses from the hold that traditional curriculum writing had on the field until then. We propose, however, that a moral core may be identified in the earliest literature of the reconceptualization. To illuminate it, we examine the texts of scholars credited with inspiring the reconceptualization. We suggest that the identification of this moral core would be a step toward curriculum theorizing that is able to provide “examination and critique of the status quo, pointers and concrete strategies for educational reform, and projections for the future of education” (Wright, 2000, p. 10).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.