Abstract
To look at the current rationale behind surgical candidacy for aural atresia. In addition, we review recent technical aspects of the procedure, as it relates to outcomes. Traditionally, aural atresia repair has been mostly reserved for bilateral atresia patients or occasionally unilateral patients with ideal conditions. Repair has also typically followed microtia repair with cartilage reconstruction. Developing literature, however, shows that the critical period of central auditory development precedes the typical timing of repair, particularly after rib cartilage microtia reconstruction. Newer synthetic microtia repairs have allowed atresia repair prior to microtia repair to capture the developmental advantages of binaural hearing early in life. We also review recent data on the use of ossicular prostheses in atresia repair regarding audiologic outcomes and other techniques attributed to better outcomes. Atresia repair remains one of the most challenging otologic procedures. As techniques improve and we understand the developing auditory system, surgical criteria may shift, with more patients becoming candidates at a younger age.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.