Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze Nash tax competition among governments that differ in geographical aspects such as their sizes and positions. Each government lying on a linear market maximizes its revenue with respect to its own commodity tax rate, taking into account the cross-border shoppings induced by the difference in tax rates. In particular, we examine how the size of the countries and their spatial arrangement affect tax rates and government revenues at a Nash equilibrium. We show that a small country chooses a lower tax rate than a big country, and obtains more than its size-proportional share of total revenue at the Nash equilibrium. We also prove that when the size of all countries are identical, the tax rates levied by the governments go down from either market boundary toward the market center, and the adjoining countries of peripheral countries can obtain the largest government revenue.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.