Cross‐border acquisitions and the asymmetric effect of power distance value difference on long‐term post‐acquisition performance

Abstract

Research summary: Inconclusive findings about the effect of national cultural differences on post‐acquisition performance may be created by the failure to distinguish among the different cultural dimensions and the asymmetry of cultural differences. To demonstrate a different approach, this study focuses on one dimension of national cultural values—power distance value (PDV) and develops a framework for the asymmetric effect ofPDVdifferences in creating two types of conflicts. The analysis of 2,115 cross‐border acquisitions in the global information technology industry shows thatPDVdifferences undermine the long‐term post‐acquisition performance of acquirers. This effect is stronger when acquirers are higher than targets inPDVthan when the opposite is the case. This asymmetric effect ofPDVdifference depends on national status difference, business relatedness, and acquisition experience.Managerial summary:National cultural differences can create “cultural clashes” to undermine the value creation by cross‐border acquisitions. During integration, individuals react to the acquirer–target hierarchy according to their respective power distance value (PDV): the extent to which they value equality (lowPDV) or hierarchy (highPDV).PDVdivergence results in two types of conflicts, depending on whether acquirers are higher or lower than targets inPDV. The two types of conflicts vary in the magnitude of their harmful effect on post‐acquisition performance. Both types of conflicts are more detrimental when acquirers are higher than targets in country status and when individuals need to interact more intensely. Acquisition experience can both help and harm post‐acquisition performance. These findings offer important implications for managing cross‐border acquisitions. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.