Abstract
According to scholars of public criminology and public sociology, our classroom teaching – including our lectures, course material, and syllabi – are forms of public criminology. If we take this to be true, a scholarly examination of these spaces is imperative. Critical criminology has operated since its inception as a subfield without clear boundaries, and within undergraduate curriculums it has been consistently marginalized as a central topic of study and teaching. In this urgent context, we provide an analysis of the dynamics of the field. Using course syllabi data and departmental data, we examine what constitutes the current critical criminology curriculum in Canada. As such, we explore (1) where it is; (2) what it is; (3) and who it is. Our analyses indicate that critical criminology is understood in both unifying and contradictory ways, is both topical and theoretical, and remains geographically varied. We outline some exploratory analyses about the place of critical scholarship in Canadian undergraduate curriculums and about the field more broadly.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.