Abstract

ObjectiveTo define criteria for determining when preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) results are suggestive of a potential balanced chromosomal rearrangement in the egg or sperm source and warrant karyotyping.DesignPerformance evaluation of criteria developed to assess PGT-A results for patterns of imbalances suggestive of a balanced chromosomal rearrangement in the egg or sperm source.SettingA single PGT-A laboratory and multiple in vitro fertilization centers.PatientsReproductive couples who underwent routine PGT-A testing.InterventionsKaryotyping of reproductive couples for whom patterns of imbalances observed in PGT-A results suggested a balanced chromosomal rearrangement in the egg or sperm source.Main Outcome MeasuresCorrect or incorrect flagging of predicted translocation in either the egg or sperm source based on chromosome analysis.ResultsProposed criteria correctly predicted a balanced reciprocal translocation in 97% of cases (n = 33), a (13;14) Robertsonian translocation in all cases (n = 3), and an inversion in all cases (n = 2). Other criteria evaluated were determined to be ineffective because of relatively low occurrences that met the criteria and/or low predictive value.ConclusionsOur results showed that the proposed criteria were effective for evaluating patterns of imbalances observed in PGT-A results suggestive of a potential chromosomal rearrangement in the egg or sperm source. Our proposed criteria can be employed by clinicians in the in vitro fertilization setting in combination with a patient’s reproductive history to identify PGT-A patients who are likely carriers of balanced chromosomal rearrangements.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.