Abstract
In a previous issue of this Journal Rapoport (1970) discussed the problems and prospects of making peace research an applied science. After examining the institutional structure in which peace research exists, and the possibilities and limitations which that structure offers for applying peace research findings, Rapoport outlined a course of action which could, he suggested, lead to an applied science of peace. In reply Kent (1971) disagreed with a number of Rapoport's points and offered an alternative course of action for increasing the application of peace research findings. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to try to clarify the major points of disagreement between Kent and Rapoport, and to offer a third direction in which peace researchers can work to apply research findings.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
