Abstract

Social workers have an ethical responsibility to be engaged in policy change, regardless of their practice area or specialization. Voter engagement and the importance of political power through voting is often overlooked in the literature as a valid and important component of social work practice. Creating a culture of nonpartisan voter engagement in practice settings can help empower individuals who have been historically and intentionally disenfranchised from our electoral system. Training for field instructors, faculty, and field staff is a key aspect of voter engagement in social work education. Unfortunately, social work education is unlikely to include substantive content on voter engagement or its connection to social work practice and impact. This article presents one component of a model for integrating voter engagement into social work education: the provision of training for field instructors on nonpartisan voter engagement at two universities over two years. Evaluation findings suggest that pre-existing levels of political efficacy affect the reaction of field instructors to nonpartisan voter engagement training. Furthermore, findings indicate that field instructors who receive voter engagement training are more likely to serve as resources for their students and to consider voter engagement as part of their own practice. We offer evidence on the important role field educators can play in the success of the larger national effort to integrate voter engagement in social work education. Increasing awareness of what social workers, nonprofit, and public agencies are allowed--or even required--to do is a critical first step.

Highlights

  • Social workers have an ethical responsibility to be engaged in policy change, regardless of their practice area or specialization

  • Social workers can engage in the voting process in a variety of ways (Lane & Pritzker, 2018)

  • Findings reported by LeRoux and Krawczyk (2012) support previous research which indicates that many social workers do not integrate voter engagement into their practice settings due to various barriers (Ritter, 2008; Rome & Hoeschstetter, 2010)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social workers have an ethical responsibility to be engaged in policy change, regardless of their practice area or specialization. This article presents one component of a model for integrating voter engagement into social work education: the provision of training for field instructors on nonpartisan voter engagement at two universities over two years. The level of involvement includes more active engagement of others, who could include colleagues, client groups, and community members This level includes assisting others with voter registration; education about the process of when, where, and how to vote; and sharing information about candidates and the issues. These steps can be partisan or nonpartisan depending on the social worker’s role and employment. The final level of voter engagement for social workers includes leadership in voter engagement, ranging from running voter engagement drives or voter education events, working as an election official, training and mentoring others in voter engagement, and engaging with the media about related issues

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.