Abstract

Offshore structures are exposed to risks of vessel collisions and impacts from dropped objects. Tubular members are extensively used in offshore construction, and thus, there is scope to investigate their crashworthiness behaviour. Aluminium, glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) and hybrid aluminium/GFRP circular tube specimens were fabricated and then tested under quasi-static and dynamic axial loading conditions. Two hybrid configurations were examined: external and internal layers from respectively aluminium and GFRP, and vice versa. The material impregnated with epoxy resin woven glass fabric was allowed to cure attached to the aluminium layer to ensure interlayer bonding. The quasi-static and dynamic tests were conducted using respectively a universal testing machine at a prescribed crosshead speed of 10 mm/min, and a 78 kg drop hammer released from 2.5 m. The non-hybrid configurations (aluminium and GFRP specimens) outperformed their hybrid counterparts in terms of crashworthiness characteristics.

Highlights

  • The term crashworthiness can be defined as the ability of a structure to absorb kinetic energy in the event of collision [1]

  • Where F is the reaction force of the structure at any δ

  • Wall cracks were observed in AL (Figure 8 top), but not developed in wall tearing as in AL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term crashworthiness can be defined as the ability of a structure to absorb kinetic energy in the event of collision [1]. The steel legs of offshore platforms may undergo indentation (local deformation), bending and stretching (global deformation) at the same time when they are in direct contact with the colliding vessel (Figure 1) In such cases and when the struck member is close to a tubular joint, the supporting braces mostly experience axial compression [2] and absorb energy through different mechanisms depending on the axial length to the cross-sectional perimeter, and the cross-sectional perimeter to wall thickness ratios [4,5].

Deformation
Specimens
Fabrication
Typical
Collapse Patterns
Results and Discussion
Force−Displacement
Dynamic Tests
Crashworthiness Parameters
Initial Peak Force and Maximum Force
Energy Absorption
Mean Crushing Force
Specific Energy Absorption
Crush Force Efficiency
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.