Abstract
The technological support for craniofacial superimposition (CFS) techniques used in the initial identifications found in the literature involved a large number of very diverse approaches. This could also be the reason for the current diversity of CFS methods and their terminology, as mentioned before. Rather than following a uniform methodology, every expert tends to apply his/her own approach to the problem, based on the available technology and his/her own knowledge of human craniofacial anatomy, soft tissues, and their relationships. Therefore, CFS approaches have evolved as new technology has become available, although their foundations were previously laid. Some of these approaches were classified in a review by Aulsebrook et al. (1995) according to the technology used to acquire the data and to support the skull-face overlay (SFO) and identification processes, that is, static photographic transparency, video technology, and computer graphics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
