Cradle-to-Gate greenhouse gas emissions of the production of ethylene from U.S. Corn ethanol and comparison to fossil-derived ethylene production.
Cradle-to-Gate greenhouse gas emissions of the production of ethylene from U.S. Corn ethanol and comparison to fossil-derived ethylene production.
- Research Article
1
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.008
- Dec 1, 2021
- One Earth
Major US electric utility climate pledges have the potential to collectively reduce power sector emissions by one-third
- Research Article
40
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.035
- Dec 10, 2010
- Biomass and Bioenergy
Reducing life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol by integrating biomass to produce heat and power at ethanol plants
- Conference Article
3
- 10.13031/2013.32038
- Jan 1, 2010
A life-cycle assessment (LCA) of corn ethanol was conducted to determine the reduction in the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of corn ethanol compared to gasoline by integrating biomass fuels in a 190 million liter (50 million gallon) per year dry-grind corn ethanol plant to replace fossil fuels (natural gas and grid electricity). The biomass fuels studied are corn stover and ethanol co-products [dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS), and syrup (solubles portion of DDGS)]. The biomass conversion technologies/systems considered are process heat (PH) only systems, combined heat and power (CHP) systems, and biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC) systems. The key inventory components of the LCA are corn production, stover production, ethanol production, fertilizer inputs, truck transport, co-product credits, ethanol transport to blending, biomass fuel conversion systems, and combustion of anhydrous ethanol (E100). The life-cycle GHG emission reduction for corn ethanol compared to gasoline (97.7 g CO2e/MJ gasoline) is 42.5% for PH with natural gas, 61.3% for PH with corn stover, 82.2% for CHP with corn stover, 81.6% for IGCC with natural gas, 127.7% for BIGCC with corn stover, and 119.1% for BIGCC with syrup and stover. These GHG emission estimates do not include indirect land use change effects. GHG emission reductions for CHP, IGCC, and BIGCC include power sent to the grid which replaces electricity from coal. BIGCC results in greater reductions in GHG emissions than IGCC with natural gas because biomass is substituted for fossil fuels. In addition, underground sequestration of CO2 gas from the ethanol plant’s fermentation tank could further reduce the life-cycle GHG emission of corn ethanol by 31.5% compared to gasoline.
- Research Article
70
- 10.1016/j.joule.2020.08.001
- Aug 25, 2020
- Joule
Mitigating Curtailment and Carbon Emissions through Load Migration between Data Centers
- Research Article
12
- 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01843
- Aug 5, 2023
- Scientific African
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction in the electricity sector: Implications of increasing renewable energy penetration in Ghana's electricity generation mix
- Conference Article
1
- 10.5339/qfarc.2016.eepp1669
- Jan 1, 2016
Energy-related activities are a major contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A growing body of knowledge clearly depicts the links between human activities and climate change. Over the last century the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil and other human activities has released carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and other heat-trapping GHG emissions into the atmosphere and thus increased the concentration of atmospheric CO2 emissions. The main human activities that emit CO2 emissions are (1) the combustion of fossil fuels to generate electricity, accounting for about 37% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 31% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2013, (2) the combustion of fossil fuels such as gasoline and diesel to transport people and goods, accounting for about 31% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 26% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2013, and (3) industrial processes such as the production and consumption of minerals and chemicals, accounting for about 15% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 12% of total ...
- Research Article
72
- 10.1002/bbb.1448
- Oct 10, 2013
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Global biofuels production grew rapidly from 2007 to 2012, led by the United States and Brazil, the world's two largest fuel‐ethanol‐producing systems. In this paper we provide insights into the characteristics of mature Brazilian sugarcane and maturing US dry mill corn ethanol industries. Both systems continue to improve as measured by life cycle data such as total renewable energy produced per unit of fossil energy consumed [renewable energy ratio (RER)]. Sugarcane self‐benchmarking systems showed RER values of 7.0 in 2002 to 9.4 in 2009 as the industry started to switch to mechanized harvesting. The average US RER improved from 1.1 to 1.7 from 2000 to 2010. RERs of 4.4 to 5.5 are observed in corn ethanol plants employing natural gas or corn stover combined heat and power. Ethanol systems configured to produce ethanol and electricity had similar net energy balances (a ratio of net energy produced to energy contained in the fuel). One measure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions (biomass use efficiency) compares the effectiveness of displacing carbon from combustion of fossil fuels with renewable carbon. Advanced corn ethanol systems reach higher GHG emission reduction levels compared to sugarcane ethanol by displacing coal‐based electricity. Sugarcane systems achieve double the GHG emissions reductions per unit of harvested land relative to corn ethanol because sugarcane and corn are grown as perennial and annual crops in tropical and temperate climatic zones, respectively. Carbon dioxide capture and storage systems could offer additional GHG emission reductions for both corn and sugarcane ethanol systems. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Research Article
12
- 10.1111/1467-8551.12533
- Jun 8, 2021
- British Journal of Management
Imposing versus Enacting Commitments for the Long‐Term Energy Transition: Perspectives from the Firm
- Discussion
6
- 10.1088/1748-9326/1/1/011002
- Nov 1, 2006
- Environmental Research Letters
In the article `The ethanol program in Brazil' [1] José Goldemberg summarizes the key features of Brazil's sugarcane ethanol program—the most successful biofuel program in the world so far. In fact, as of 2005, Brazil was the world's largest producer of fuel ethanol. In addition to providing 40% of its gasoline market with ethanol, Brazil exports a significant amount of ethanol to Europe, Japan, and the United States. The success of the program is attributed to a variety of factors, including supportive governmental policies and favorable natural conditions (such as a tropical climate with abundant rainfall and high temperatures).
- Research Article
7
- 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107176
- Feb 8, 2022
- Fuel Processing Technology
Renewable-carbon recovery in the co-processing of vacuum gas oil and bio-oil in the FCC process – Where does the renewable carbon go?
- Research Article
6
- 10.3390/en4050780
- May 4, 2011
- Energies
With their increasing shares of global emissions developing economies are increasingly being pressured to assume a greater role in global greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction. Developed countries have invested tremendously in and proclaimed renewable energy (RE) and associated smart power technologies as solutions to meet their energy demands and reduce their GHG emissions at the same time. However, in the developing economies, these technologies may not deliver the desired results because they have their unique characteristics and priorities, which are different from those of the developed world. Many GHG emission reduction technologies are still very expensive and not fully developed. For the developing economies, the adoption threshold may become very high. Therefore, the cost effectiveness and practicality of each technology in reducing GHG emission in the developing economies may be very different from that of the developed economies. In this paper, available RE and other GHG emission reduction technologies are individually considered in a case study on Sabah, one of the 13 states in Malaysia, in order to assess the effects of the individual technologies on GHG emission and electricity cost reductions.
- Conference Article
- 10.13031/2013.35921
- Jan 1, 2010
The objective of this study was to estimate the effects of dairy diets, manure-handling methods, and interactions with the bio-fuels industry on the net energy intensity, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and land use for milk production in Wisconsin. Five dairy diets supplemented with varying amounts of co-products from corn ethanol and soybean biodiesel production were modeled in two manure management scenarios: with and without on-farm biogas generation. The diets were characterized by different inclusion of soybean meal (SBM) and dry distillers grains with solubles (DDGS), balanced with different types forages. A partial life cycle assessment (LCA) of milk production from cradle to farm gate was performed. Milk production was used as the primary output for this analysis, since the dairy industry will remain the primary agricultural enterprise in Wisconsin for the foreseeable future. The boundaries of the milk production system were expanded to include bio-fuels production. The production of bio-fuels (corn ethanol and biodiesel) was scaled to meet the dietary requirements of each selected dairy ration. The choice of dairy ration had a substantial effect on GHG emissions and net energy intensity per energy corrected milk (ECM) produced. Land use for the integrated dairy and bio-fuels production systems ranged from 1.68 m2/kg ECM to 2.01 m2/kg ECM. Accounting for bio-fuels credits but without biogas generation, net energy intensity ranged from 0.83 MJ/kg ECM to 1.34 MJ/kg ECM, and GHG emissions ranged from 0.69 kg CO2-eq/kg ECM to 0.80 kg CO2-eq/kg ECM, depending on the diet. The average effects of including anaerobic digesters for on-farm biogas generation were reductions in GHG emissions by 0.24 kg CO2-eq/kg ECM, and in net energy intensity by 2.84 MJ/kg ECM.
- Research Article
97
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.03.007
- Apr 1, 2022
- One Earth
Plastics and climate change—Breaking carbon lock-ins through three mitigation pathways
- Conference Article
1
- 10.15396/eres2021_48
- Jan 1, 2021
National and international agreements aim to limit climate change and thus call for a reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to nearly zero. A wide range of technologies promise to reduce the heat demand of buildings and also promote renewable energies. One of these technologies is the use of solid building structures as thermal storage, so called thermally activated building parts or TABS. Thermal simulations of such energy concept for a typical single-family house with 140 m² living space featuring a heat pump, a solar thermal collector and TABS show that the share of solar heat for heat supply can be increased, resulting in a decreased use of the heat pump and thus a lower demand of electric energy. This leads to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and lower operating costs. Furthermore, the simulations show that larger sizes of the TABS and the solar thermal collector lead to lower demand of electric energy. To secure a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and costs over the whole lifecycle of a building also production and dismantling, disposal and recycling must be considered. A Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis shows that TABS in combination with solar heat reduce LCC, expressed as present values, by app. 34%. The reductions are mainly due to the lower operating costs of the heating system. Increasing the size of south-facing solar collectors leads to asymptotically decreasing costs. For the less favourable orientations to the West and East, the optimum size of the collector is between 30 and 40 m², depending on the orientation and the size of the TABS. A minimum size of the TABS must be available, while additional TABS do not lead to further reductions. Also in an ecologic sense, the use of TABS in combination with solar heat is beneficial. The simulations in this research show that the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions over the whole lifecycle can be reduced by 27%. Again, the reduction mainly results from the decreased demand of electric energy and only slightly higher GHG emissions from the production of the TABS. Larger collector sizes lead to asymptotically reduced GHG emissions, when south facing. In contrast, orientations to the East and West lead to increased GHG emissions as the size of the collector increases. Integrated systems of heat pumps, solar thermal collectors and TABS could also be considered for multi-family housing and other building types. Simulations of LCC and LCA offer a suited means for assessing economic and ecologic impacts of innovative buildings concepts and should be used on a wider scale, ideally in combination.
- Research Article
1
- 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.261
- Feb 1, 2009
- Energy Procedia
Harmonizing the quantification of CCS GHG emission reductions through oil and natural gas industry project guidelines
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.