Crack initiation under far-field cyclic compression and the study of short fatigue cracks

Abstract

A procedure involving crack initiation under far-field cyclic compression is used to study the fatigue behavior of small flaws which are ~0.3–0.5 mm in length and are amenable to linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) characterization. This technique enables the determination of the threshold stress intensity range at which crack growth begins for small flaws and provides insight into some closure characteristics. Cracks were propagated in notched specimens of a bainitic steel subjected to fully compressive remote cyclic loads, until complete crack arrest occurred after growth over a distance of only a fraction of a mm at a progressively decreasing velocity. Following this, physically small flaws were obtained by machining away the notch. For the loads examined, the results indicate that the extent of damage left at the tip of the crack grown (and arrested) under remote compression is not large enough to affect subsequent tensile fatigue crack growth, when closure effects are not significant (e.g. at high load ratios). At high load ratios, the growth of small linear elastic cracks is identical to that of corresponding long flaws subjected to the same stress intensity range, which corroborates the similitude concept implicit in the nominal use of LEFM. At low load ratios, however, short tensile cracks propagate substantially faster than the longer flaws and exhibit lower threshold stress intensity range levels. Such apparent differences in their growth rates seem to arise, to a large extent, from the differences in their closure behavior, as indicated clearly from various aspects of the compression method. Global measurements of closure, with their inherent uncertainties, however, cannot account completely for the anomalous behavior of short flaws and for the effect of load ratio on short crack growth. Closure of short flaws begins to develop after growth over a minimum distance of about 0.5 mm in this steel. The significance and limitations of the compression technique are discussed and possible mechanisms responsible for the differences between long and short fatigue cracks are outlined.