Abstract
Control of visual attention by auditory stimuli is explored in seven previously unpublished experiments that were presented at conferences in the late 1980s. Reaction time (RT) to luminance targets was found to be affected by the spatial congruence between the target and a preceding or simultaneous, and non-informative, auditory event, suggesting that localizable auditory stimuli exogenously (rapidly and automatically) capture visual attention. These cuing effects were obtained in the absence of eye movements and do not appear to be mediated merely by criterion adjustments. When the information value of the auditory event was placed in conflict with its location (i.e., a tone on the right indicated that the visual target was likely to appear on the left), it was found that at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) reaction time (RT) was faster for targets at the stimulated location, an effect that disappeared within 500 ms and was reversed by 1000 ms. This demonstrates that it requires over 500 ms for endogenous orienting in response to probabilistic information about target location to overcome the powerful exogenous control of visual attention by localizable auditory stimulation. Simple RT to auditory stimuli was unaffected by the spatial congruence of a preceding or simultaneous visual stimulus. When uninformative, neither pitch contours (rising/falling tones) nor pitch (high/low tones) produced significant visual orienting along the vertical midline. When the direction of a pitch contour indicated the likely location of a visual target, participants were able to shift their attention if the relation between the natural meaning and the probabilistic information was compatible (e.g., rising contour signaled that a upper target was likely) but not when it was incompatible. The relation of these 30-year-old experiments to contemporary findings and ideas is discussed.
Highlights
IntroductionPosner (1980) [2] put forward two distinctions to help classify different forms of orienting (see Klein, 2005) [3]
Spatial orienting refers to adjustments that improve the processing of stimuli coming from a location in space or that improve their access to response mechanisms [1] (Posner, 1978).Posner (1980) [2] put forward two distinctions to help classify different forms of orienting [3]
These results demonstrate that localizable auditory events can cause an exogenous shift of visual attention and that this effect seems to be fully blown at an stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 0 ms
Summary
Posner (1980) [2] put forward two distinctions to help classify different forms of orienting (see Klein, 2005) [3] When such adjustments are accomplished by mechanical changes in the sensory apparatus (e.g., shifts in gaze; pinna movements) they are referred to as overt. The work described here is primarily about covert shifts of attention in visual space under the control of stimuli presented to the auditory modality. Our primary concern is with the ability of auditory stimuli to exogenously generate a covert shift of visual attention, in some experiments that are designed to characterize the nature of this control, we will make the auditory stimuli informative; and in one study we will explore the converse possibility. All of the reported experiments use a variant of Posner’s cuing paradigm
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
