Abstract

Li-ion batteries are the backbone of all electric vehicles (EVs) in production today [1]. However, they compete poorly against the few-minute refueling time of fossil fuel powered vehicles [2, 3]. To successfully replace fossil fuel powered vehicles, the EV batteries must support charging rates under the 15-minute mark as determined by the eXtreme Fast Charging (XFC) standard defined by the U.S. Department of Energy [4]. When subjected to XFC charging rates, well-known problems of lithium plating and delamination plague graphite anodes due to local potential gradients and binder degradation respectively [5].Our work replaces the traditional polymer binder with conductive titanium carbide interconnects that covalently join graphite particles as well as bond them to the current collector [6]. This new architecture demonstrates ~400% increase in electrical conductivity compared to traditional architectures with polymer binders while maintaining interparticle integrity and improving adhesion. The adhesion and mechanical properties are provided by conductive chemical bonds mitigating delamination as these novel bonds suffer less mechanical and chemical degradation under high current rates than adhesion provided by polymer binders. The improved conductivity was also utilized to form a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) at rates up to 4C reducing the ionic impedance of the SEI interface significantly [7]. The improved graphite electrodes can sustain 15-minute charge maintaining 80% of the specific capacity of the graphite particles for 800 cycles at commercially relevant loadings. Our studies introduce an effective strategy to engineer Li-ion battery electrode architectures that simultaneously improve electrical and ionic conductivity mitigating lithium plating and delamination under XFC charging rate needed for the mass adoption of EVs. Habib, A.A., S. Motakabber, and M.I. Ibrahimy. A comparative study of electrochemical battery for electric vehicles applications. in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Power, Electrical, and Electronics and Industrial Applications (PEEIACON). 2019. IEEE.Balali, Y. and S. Stegen, Review of energy storage systems for vehicles based on technology, environmental impacts, and costs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021. 135: p. 110185.Andwari, A.M., et al., A review of Battery Electric Vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 78: p. 414-430.Dufek, E.J., et al., Developing extreme fast charge battery protocols–A review spanning materials to systems. Journal of Power Sources, 2022: p. 231129.Ahmed, S., et al., Enabling fast charging–A battery technology gap assessment. Journal of Power Sources, 2017. 367: p. 250-262.Rangom, Y., Covalently Joined Carbonaceous and Mettalloid Powders by Carbide-Based Interconnects and Method of Fabrication for High-Performance Electrodes. 2021: United States preliminary patent #63/248,293.Rangom, Y., T.T. Duignan, and X. Zhao, Lithium-ion transport behavior in thin-film graphite electrodes with SEI layers formed at different current densities. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021. 13(36): p. 42662-42669. Figure 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.