Abstract

BackgroundOlder people with multi-morbidity are increasingly challenging for today’s healthcare, and novel, cost-effective healthcare solutions are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at an ambulatory geriatric unit for people ≥75 years with multi-morbidity.MethodThe primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a CGA strategy with usual care in a Swedish setting. Outcomes were estimated over a lifelong time horizon using decision-analytic modelling based on data from the randomized AGe-FIT trial. The analysis employed a public health care sector perspective. Costs and QALYs were discounted by 3% per annum and are reported in 2016 euros.ResultsCompared with usual care CGA was associated with a per patient mean incremental cost of approximately 25,000 EUR and a gain of 0.54 QALYs resulting in an ICER of 46,000 EUR. The incremental costs were primarily caused by intervention costs and costs associated with increased survival, whereas the gain in QALYs was primarily a consequence of the fact that patients in the CGA group lived longer.ConclusionCGA in an ambulatory setting for older people with multi-morbidity results in a cost per QALY of 46,000 EUR compared with usual care, a figure generally considered reasonable in a Swedish healthcare context. A rather simple reorganisation of care for older people with multi-morbidity may therefore cost effectively contribute to meet the needs of this complex patient population.Trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov, NCT01446757. September, 2011.

Highlights

  • Older people with multi-morbidity are increasingly challenging for today’s healthcare, and novel, costeffective healthcare solutions are needed

  • Compared with usual care comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was associated with a per patient mean incremental cost of approximately 25,000 EUR and a gain of 0.54 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 46,000 EUR

  • The incremental costs were primarily caused by intervention costs and costs associated with increased survival, whereas the gain in QALYs was primarily a consequence of the fact that patients in the CGA group lived longer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Older people with multi-morbidity are increasingly challenging for today’s healthcare, and novel, costeffective healthcare solutions are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at an ambulatory geriatric unit for people ≥75 years with multi-morbidity. With a rapid increase in the population of elderly, healthcare solutions that better meet the needs of these patients by improving longevity and quality of life (QoL) at a reasonable cost are required. In the Ambulatory Geriatric assessment – a Frailty Intervention Trial (AGeFIT), CGA in outpatient care reduced the number of inpatient days and increased the sense of security for the patients at a 2-year follow-up when compared to usual care [8]. To fully assess the overall value of CGA, the long-term (beyond trial follow-up) impact on ultimate health outcomes such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of CGA has to be assessed [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.