Cost-effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy.

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis is a relevant and global health problem affecting up to 5-50% of the general population and its prevalence is increasing due to climate change and pollution among other factors and counts among the 10 most frequent reasons for medical consultation, generating an important economic impact. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only allergy-disease-modifying treatment and there is plenty of evidence of its effectiveness with regards subcutaneous and oral routes of AIT.This narrative review article examines published literature in the last 24 months regarding the pharmacoeconomics of AIT versus standard of care treatment (SOC) for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Farraia et al. assessed in 2022 subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT, _438/$500.28) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) (_1021/$1116.19) plus symptomatic treatment versus SOC treatment in children with HDM-driven allergic asthma, measuring QALYs, decrease of medication, decrease of exacerbations and symptoms. They used the cost-effective threshold: _18 482.80 ($21 110.14), finding that AIT is cost-effective.Also, SCIT and SLIT plus symptomatic treatment was assessed versus SOC treatment in children with grass pollen allergic rhinitis. The authors concluded that SCIT (_933/$1065.67) and SLIT (_1408/ $1608.22) seem cost-effective, particularly SCIT. Allergen immunotherapy is cost-effective in the management of allergic rhinitis and asthma as compared with SOC alone. As most studies consider only during-treatment costs and no long-term benefits or preventive effects are being assessed, the real cost-effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy could be even higher.