Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine

Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has not been compared in a prospective study in primary care. To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of TCAs, SSRIs and lofepramine in UK primary care. An open-label, three-arm randomised trial with a preference arm. Practitioners referred 327 patients with incident depression. No significant differences were found in effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. The numbers of depression-free weeks over 12 months (on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were 25.3 (95% CI 21.3-29.0) for TCAs, 28.3 (95% CI 24.3-32.2) for SSRIs and 24.6 (95% CI 20.6-28.9) for lofepramine. Mean health service costs per patient were pound 762 (95% CI 553-1059) for TCAs, pound 875 (95% CI 675-1355) for SSRIs and pound 867 (95% CI 634-1521) for lofepramine. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested SSRIs were most cost-effective (with a probability of up to 0.6). The findings support a policy of recommending SSRIs as first-choice antidepressants in primary care.