CoRu Alloy/Ru Nanoparticles: A Synergistic Catalyst for Efficient pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution

Open AccessCCS ChemistryMINI REVIEWS28 Dec 2022Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction over Bimetallic Bi-Based Catalysts: A Review Wei Chen, Yating Wang, Yuhang Li and Chunzhong Li Wei Chen Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Hierarchical Nanomaterials, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237 , Yating Wang Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Hierarchical Nanomaterials, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237 , Yuhang Li *Corresponding authors: E-mail Address: [email protected] E-mail Address: [email protected] Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Hierarchical Nanomaterials, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237 and Chunzhong Li *Corresponding authors: E-mail Address: [email protected] E-mail Address: [email protected] Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Hierarchical Nanomaterials, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237 School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237 https://doi.org/10.31635/ccschem.022.202202357 SectionsAboutAbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) to valuable fuels is an up-and-coming approach. Owing to the low cost, environmental friendliness, and high selectivity to formate single product at low overpotentials, bismuth (Bi)-based catalysts have attracted extensive research attention. In this review, the reaction mechanisms of Bi-based catalysts are first introduced, and the bimetallic Bi-based catalysts synthesized by alloying, doping, and loading strategies are reviewed from the aspects of catalyst component, morphology, synthesis procedure, and performance optimization for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. We provide an in-depth discussion of the existing challenges and an outlook for this highly promising kind of electrocatalysis. Download figure Download PowerPoint Introduction The energy crisis and environmental pollution have been ongoing significant issues and the focus of the international community. Over the past few decades, the strong dependence and overuse of fossil fuels has resulted in a rapid increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere.1,2 When the World Meteorological Organization released its latest Greenhouse Gas Bulletin, they pointed out that the current CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 149% of preindustrial levels.3 The Bulletin additionally noted that greenhouse gases have increased by 47% through radiative forcing, with CO2 accounting for 80% of this increase from 1990 to 2020. The emission of an oversized quantity of CO2 and other harmful gases has resulted in global warming and environmental pollution, documented in numerous studies related to the energy and environment around the world. CO2 emission reduction is urgently needed. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction In order to curtail the global warming trend, scientists conduct in-depth discussions and research on the issue of reducing CO2 emissions. There are four primary strategies: (a) developing new clean energy technologies; (b) upgrading existing processes to eliminate and replace the low-efficiency sectors and equipment in traditional technologies;1 (c) afforestation and forestation; and (d) carbon capture, utilization and storage.4,5 Research on carbon capture, carbon storage, and carbon utilization has produced many advances and breakthroughs in CO2 storage and conversion. Among them, carbon capture and storage technology have certain limitations. First of all, the technology is expensive. Second, storage equipment may leak and cause a series of other hidden safety problems, such as local seawater acidification. In contrast, carbon capture and utilization technology, which reduce CO2 and convert it into usable chemical value-added fuels, possesses greater development prospects.6–8 Not only can this technology reduce high CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere, but it also produces renewable fuels to combat the energy crisis. In recent years, numerous catalytic conversion methods have been developed successively. The methods used for CO2 reduction chiefly include biological (enzyme) catalysis, photocatalysis, thermocatalysis, and electrocatalysis.9–12 At present, electrocatalysis as an emerging energy technology for CO2 emission reduction and production of value-added fuels receives a great deal of research attention.7 Compared with traditional industrial processes, electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) can be carried out under milder environmental conditions, improving electrochemical stability and selectivity in CO2RR via selecting appropriate electrocatalysts to manipulate reaction-tailored products.13 In this regard, reports in the literature demonstrate the exploration of various electrocatalysts and electrode reaction mechanisms for CO2RR. CO2RR also utilizes renewable energy for catalytic reactions to achieve large-scale energy storage and production of high-energy products.14 Generally, CO2RR is in a position to produce a variety of reduction products through electrocatalysis. The corresponding reduction products are different as electron-transferred numbers change. Electrocatalytic CO2RR products are categorized as formic acid (HCOOH),12 carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), methanol (CH3OH) as C1, and ethanoic acid (CH3COOH), ethanol (C2H5OH)15 as C2.16,17 The above reduction products are obtained by various electron-transfer mechanisms and half-reactions, as shown in Table 1.18,19 Table 1 | Electrochemical Potentials of Several CO2 Reduction Reactions CO2 Reduction Half-Reactions Electrode PotentialV (vs SHE) Electrode PotentialV (vs RHE) CO2 + 2H+ + 2e− → CO + H2O −0.52 −0.106 CO2 + 2H+ + 2e− → HCOOH −0.61 −0.250 CO2 + 4H+ + 4e− → HCHO + H2O −0.51 −0.070 CO2 + 6H+ + 6e− → CH3OH + H2O −0.38 0.016 CO2 + 8H+ + 8e− → CH4 + 2H2O −0.24 0.169 2CO2 + 12H+ + 12e− → C2H4 + 4H2O −0.34 0.064 2CO2 + 12H+ + 12e− → C2H5OH + 3H2O −0.33 0.084 During the electrocatalytic reduction process, not solely CO2RR but also other side reactions will occur, resulting in the complexity of the reaction. For instance, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) competes with CO2RR to generate H2, which decreases the performance of CO2RR20–22 in order to efficiently overcome the energy barrier of electron-transfer proton coupling, accelerate the catalytic reaction rate. and suppress the occurrence of side reaction processes. The development of ideal catalysts with remarkable CO2RR selectivity and activity is the focus of current research. Several parameters of electrocatalytic performance for CO2RR catalysts can primarily be evaluated, including Faradaic efficiency (FE), overpotential, current density, Tafel slope, stability, and so on.7,12,14 FE is the charge required as a percentage of the initial charge to cross the working electrode and facilitate the electrochemical reaction. In simple terms, FE is a significant indicator to measure the selectivity of electrocatalytic CO2RR products.23 Due to the complex reaction mechanism and sluggish kinetics, the actual reduction reaction working potential is more negative than the theoretical reduction potential. High reduction overpotentials lead to wasted energy and significant HER reactions. Therefore, overpotential is an important indicator in evaluating the electrocatalytic activity of CO2RR catalysts. Studies confirm that when current density goes above 300 mA cm−2, the production cost will be reduced as much as possible.24 The equation of Tafel (η = blgj + a) is able to directly reflect the rate of reaction dominated by kinetics. The smaller the Tafel slope of b in the equation, the faster the electrochemical reaction rate and the higher the catalytic activity, which is more favorable for the electrocatalytic reaction.25 Stability is an indicator of whether an excellent electrocatalyst possesses long-term stability and efficiency.26 The stability of electrocatalysts is usually effectively assessed with potentiostatic electrolysis or cyclic voltammetry. Bismuth-based electrocatalysts Recently, P-block electrocatalysts consisting of bismuth (Bi),27–30 tin (Sn),31–33 lead (Pb),34–36 and indium (In)37,38 have inarguably facilitated electrocatalytic CO2 reduction with remarkable selectivity for C1 products, especially formic acid or formate. The advantage of electrocatalytic generation of formate lies in the high selectivity and current density achieved by prohibiting competing side reactions. Compared with other value-added products from CO2 reduction, which are difficult to solely generate and low in yield, the FE of Bi-based CO2 toward formate can reach nearly 100%.39 In addition, formate is a liquid product with excellent chemical stability at room temperature for storage and transportation compared to gas-phase products such as CO. Experts evaluate various chemicals with economic viability in CO2RR and discovered that formate has considerable marketability.13 Moreover, converting CO2 toward formate is a 2-electron transfer process, leading to a low production cost of 1$US/0.59 kg, suggesting that CO2 electrolysis of formate is more cost-competitive than the C2 product production process.40 It may be difficult to attain widespread application of Pb and In metals on a marketable scale because of toxicity or low availability. However, Bi is a dramatic and promising electrocatalyst due to its low cost, nontoxicity, environmental safety, relatively single reduction product, and high formate generation activity. Bi-based catalysts can be traced back to the Bi electrocatalyst synthesized by Komatsu's team in 1995.41 In the following decades, research on Bi-based catalysts continued to deepen. Monometallic catalysts, including metallic Bi, are currently a hot topic in the field of electrocatalysis. Recently, with in-depth exploration and development of synthesis techniques, various nanostructured monometallic Bi catalysts have been designed, such as nanoparticles, nanowires, nanotubes, nanosheets, nanodendrites, and so on, in multidimensional aspects. However, monometallic Bi catalysts may be undesirable for the breakthrough of formate electrosynthesis, owing to the limited active sites on the catalyst surface. This means that monometallic Bi catalysts usually require high overpotential to achieve high formate FE and partial current density. Compared with the monometallic Bi catalysts that use advanced synthetic strategies or tedious structural optimization to enhance their performance, bimetallic Bi-based catalysts will further involve synergistic effects. The synergistic interaction between bimetals gives the bimetallic electrocatalyst a superior catalytic performance.42 The synergistic effects in bimetallic Bi-based catalysts can be broadly viewed as Bi acting as the active site and the other metals mainly playing three roles: (1) tailoring the electronic structures of Bi sites, (2) regulating the adsorption states of the key intermediates, and (3) generating interfacial active sites to further enhance performance. Through the electronic structure modulations by the second metal, the bimetallic Bi-based catalysts will boost the formation of the key intermediate OCHO*, thus improving the performance of CO2 electroreduction to formate. The activity, selectivity, and stability will be further improved via preparing bimetallic Bi-based materials through strategies such as alloying, surface doping, defect introduction, and nanoengineering. Here, in this review, the representative reaction pathways of Bi-based electrocatalysts are first introduced, and then the reaction mechanisms of bimetallic Bi-based heterogeneous CO2RR electrocatalysts are summarized with examples from the perspective of reaction pathways. Afterward, based on the Bi-based electrocatalysts in recent development, we divide bimetallic Bi-based catalysts into three categories: (1) alloyed Bi, (2) doped Bi, and (3) supported Bi. For each category, we describe in detail its performance-enhancing strategies and provide examples of catalysts, including descriptions of their preparation process, composition, morphology, catalytic activity, and product properties. Finally, we provide an in-depth analysis of the existing challenges and the current outlook for this field. Reaction Mechanisms of the Bi-Based Electrocatalysts Bi-based catalysts have high efficiency, selectivity, and stability to form formate via electrocatalytic CO2RR in aqueous solutions. They also possess the capacity to generate CO, according to some reports.43 The pathways of the formate and CO products are comparatively simple compared to that of other CO2RR products, and the essential difference is the intermediate products. An in-depth study of the electrocatalytic CO2RR process on the surface of Bi-based catalysts is required for a good understanding of the catalytic mechanism of Bi metals. In general, there are three types of steps involving the generation of products theoretically, consisting of: (1) reactant adsorption on the electrocatalytic surface, (2) transfer of electrons and protons to the reactant, and (3) the products desorption from the electrocatalyst surface.44 Research demonstrates that the first proton coupling determines the selectivity for a catalyst, which takes place at the C or O in CO2*− radical anion. Three reaction pathways for electrocatalytic CO2RR over Bi-based catalysts are displayed in Figure 1: (a) Generally, CO2 comes into contact with the catalyst via carbon or oxygen atoms. If the carbon atom binds to the catalyst electrode surface first, *COOH intermediate will be formed, which is the first intermediate for CO2 activation in this pathway. However, *COOH intermediate will have multiple pathways in the second proton coupling electron transfer (PCET) process, which is not conducive to promoting highly selective formate production. *COOH can lose H2O to form CO, or be reduced to form HCOOH. (b) Compared to pathway a, pathway b is different in that the oxygen is bound to the electrode surface, by which CO2* − hydrogenation forms the HCOO* intermediate.19 Based on the reaction mechanism of Bi-based catalysts, the second PCET process of the HCOO* intermediate can only generate HCOOH.(c) In the pathway c, CO2 forms the OCHO* intermediate during the first PCET when only one oxygen molecule is bound to the surface electrode. Formate is the only product obtained via a subsequent second PCET process. Theoretical analyses indicate that the formation energy barrier of OCHO* intermediate is lower than that of *COOH and HCOO* intermediates, leading to the importance of OCHO* intermediates in the Bi-based electroreduction process.45 Figure 1 | Possible electrochemical reaction pathways of CO2 over Bi-based catalysts. Download figure Download PowerPoint Theoretical calculations confirm that the CO2RR process of Bi-based catalysts follows the key intermediate of OCHO* from a PCET mechanism, facilitating highly selective formate production. The specific mechanism equations (1–5) for reducing CO2 pathway in solution to HCOOH are summarized as follows:46 CO 2 ( g ) → CO 2 * (1) CO 2 * + e − → CO 2 * − (2) CO 2 * − + e − + H + → OCHO * − (3) OCHO * − + e − + H + → HCOOH * (4) HCOOH * → HCOOH ( aq ) + * (5)where * denotes the catalytic surface or adsorption site, initially the CO2 molecules are dissolved in the solution and contact the electrode surface to form adsorbed CO2*. Afterwards, single electron is transferred to CO2* that forms the CO2* − radical anion. According to HCO3 − ↔ H+ + CO32−, electron transfer and proton coupling form OCHO* − intermediates. Ultimately, OCHO* − forms formic acid solution by PCET. Since the slow kinetics of the electrocatalytic CO2RR process, HER side reactions inevitably generate H2, and some reduction reactions are accompanied by CO generation, which negatively affects the highly selective production of formate from Bi-based materials. For the purpose of obtaining more formate, the production of H2 and CO is reduced as much as possible. The catalytic mechanism may be diametrically different in the same Bi-based alloy, depending on the content of two metal elements. Therefore, the reaction mechanism is manipulated via controlling different proportions of the two metals in bimetallic Bi-based electrocatalysts. For instance, Zhang et al.47 have developed CuO/Bi(OH)3 decorated on carbon nanotubes for CO2 electroreduction. CuBi#8 and CuBi#4 are bimetallic nanoparticles obtained via a two-step hydrolysis method and adjusted the Cu/Bi ratio. CuBi#8 and CuBi#4 exhibit CO and formate FE of 96% and 60% at −0.99 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) (VRHE), respectively. It is found that with Bi content increasing, HER is well suppressed, and the products are mainly CO. By further increasing Bi content, FEHCOOH rapidly increases accompanied by the rapid decrease of FECO. FEHCOOH reaches the maximum of 96% at 12.5 mA cm−2. The conversion of intermediates from *COOH to OCHO* via increasing Bi content further illustrates the high selectivity of OCHO* to formate. Adjusting the optimal Cu/Bi ratio suppresses the production of CO and H2, leading to efficient production of formate. In addition, defects such as oxygen vacancies or doped atoms significantly improve the catalytic performance.12 Li et al.48 have prepared Sn atom-doped Bi2O3 nanosheet (NS) electrocatalysts by constant electrolysis. Three products can be detected during the electrolysis, including H2, CO, and HCOOH. The Sn-doped Bi2O3 NSs current density is significantly increased compared to the undoped Bi2O3 NSs. The 2.5% Sn-doped Bi2O3 NSs exhibit high selectivity for formate, obtaining a supreme FE of 93.4% at the potential of −0.97 V. The HER inhibition effect is significantly enhanced compared to the undoped Bi2O3 NSs. Moreover, the catalytic capacity is optimized by coping with significant HER and expanding its specific surface area. For the first time, metallic aerogel is a three-dimensional (3D) material that has attracted enormous attention due to its abundant specific surface area, contributing to the generation of more catalytic centers.49 In addition, adjusting the partial pH can also improve the selectivity of CO2RR, and proper control of pH into acidity facilitates the formation of formate.50 Advanced Bi-Based Electrocatalysts for CO2 Reduction In recent decades, various Bi-based CO2 reduction electrocatalysts have been exhaustively studied, mainly with formate as the end product. Especially, the preparation of bimetallic catalysts via different synthetic methods is the focus of most current studies. Bimetallic Bi-based catalysts can mainly be classified into three types: (1) alloyed Bi, (2) doped Bi, and (3) supported Bi. Detailed CO2RR performances of bimetallic Bi-based electrocatalysts are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 | Performance of Bimetallic Bi-Based Catalysts in Electrocatalytic CO2RR Catalyst Electrolyte Major Products FE (%) Potential at FEMax (V) Current Density (mA cm−2) Stability (h) References Bi5Sn60 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate 94.8 −1.0 (vs RHE) 34 20 52 BixSny/Cu 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate 90.4 −0.84 (vs RHE) 30 12 53 Bi-Sn aerogel 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate 93.9 −1.0 (vs RHE) 9.3 10 57 Cu-Bi 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate 90 −0.8 (vs RHE) >2 — 60 CuBi-100 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 94.7 −1.0 (vs RHE) 12.8 8 61 CuBi 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 94.4 −0.97 (vs RHE) 38.5 — 62 CuBi 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 98.3 −1.07 (vs RHE) 56.6 — 62 Bi/Cu 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 95 −0.9 (vs RHE) 59.7 12 64 CuBi75 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 100 −0.77 (vs RHE) 33.65 24 66 Cu1-Bi/Bi2O3@C 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 93.4 −0.94 (vs RHE) 10.1 10 67 Pd3Bi-IMA 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate >90 −0.35 (vs RHE) 3 8 68 a-NPSB 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate 88.4 −1.15 (vs RHE) 21.2 18 70 Bi–Pt complex 0.1 M TBAPF6/THF CO 82 −1.25 (vs NHE) 0.125 — 71 Mo-Bi BMC/CP 0.5 M [Bmim]BF4 CH3OH 71.2 −0.7 (vs SHE) 12.1 — 72 Sn-doped Bi2O3 NSs 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 93.4 −0.97 (vs RHE) 24.3 8 48 Bi/Bi(Sn)Ox NWs 1 M KOH Formate ∼100 −0.7 (vs RHE) 301.4 20 77 Cu-Bi2Se3 0.5 M NaHCO3 Formate 65.31 −1.3 (vs RHE) 24.1 24 78 Ce–[email protected]x/C 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 96 −1.7 (vs SHE) 15.2 10 79 BiIn5[email protected] 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 97.5 −0.86 (vs RHE) 13.5 15 81 Bi-Sn/CF 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 96 −1.1 (vs RHE) 45 100 82 Sn0.80Bi0.20@Bi-SnOx 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate 95.8 −0.88 (vs RHE) 74.6 — 83 Bi-SnO/Cu 0.1 M KHCO3 Formate 93 −1.7 (vs Ag/AgCl) — 30 84 [email protected] 0.5 M NaHCO3 Formate 95 (vs RHE) 15 12 45 NSs 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate −0.86 (vs RHE) 8 90 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate −0.8 (vs RHE) 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate −0.8 (vs RHE) 10 [email protected] 0.5 M KHCO3 Formate (vs RHE) 10 M Formate (vs RHE) 34 Bi The is one of the methods to enhance the electrocatalytic performance of Bi-based effects facilitate the catalytic reaction by a between two different metal elements. P-block catalysts have CO2 conversion that is highly selective for Among them, Bi-Sn bimetallic is the most is a and method for the preparation of The method a of two metallic elements. Bimetallic obtained via are or and possess such as high density and can improve the catalytic activity of the catalyst Li et have two Bi and on the an In this different electrode The at different of This structure is to the surface and more catalytic When the of metal Bi and the of metal Sn 60 the catalytic performance the as the of −1.0 with mA partial current density, the FE of formate it excellent formate yield, which superior to most electrocatalysts. The of bimetallic is to the OCHO* intermediate and suppress the HER process. Li et have also electrocatalysts on and discovered that the FE of formate enhanced by the Bi content in the BixSny/Cu electrode. is an emerging in electrocatalytic due to their structure and the of the catalyst, contributing to the generation of more catalytic Bimetallic prepared by the method it to compared with methods such as or solution et have prepared Bi-Sn bimetallic under with and abundant Bi and Sn the of via controlling the ratio. with with a electron as shown in Figure abundant of that favorable for and abundant active sites during electrocatalysis. The of the Bi-Sn aerogel well with of Sn and Bi suggesting that the obtained aerogel is a Bi-Sn The that the are and corresponding to the and of Bi and This that the Sn and Bi are and more reaction sites are during the catalytic process. The the of Sn and Bi in the The electrochemical performance displayed compared with Sn and Bi catalysts, Bi-Sn aerogel excellent performance for formate with FE as high as Density that electronic between Bi and Sn the energy barrier for formate, the electrocatalytic performance In can indicate the reaction pathway of Bi-Sn aerogel bimetallic catalyst in CO2RR. shown in Figure the at at V and more as the potential increased from to V. This is to the that in the formate intermediate HCOO* is in suggesting that the synergistic effects between Bi-Sn bimetals can the generation of Figure 2 | (a) of the synthesis of Bi-Sn (b) of (c) of (d) and the corresponding of the catalytic mechanism of the of Bi-Sn with various with from Download figure Download PowerPoint is a and catalyst in the field of electrocatalysis. The product selectivity of catalysts is C1 products such as formate and CH4 and value-added fuels such as The of the Bi and to form a Cu-Bi usually formate conversion and the HER The reaction intermediates with of the between bimetallic Cu-Bi facilitate the catalytic reaction. et have synthesized bimetallic Cu-Bi electrocatalysts with Owing to the difference between Bi and the of bimetallic defect sites with high density, leading to the formation of more catalytic Cu-Bi exhibit lower current for HER and CO evolution thus the higher selectivity of Cu-Bi for formate. At −0.8 the FE of the formate product In to materials obtained by have numerous and catalytic activity will be Through the of bimetallic catalysts, the of reaction sites of electrocatalysts are increased as much as and the electrochemical of product selectivity is For instance, et have synthesized bimetallic Cu-Bi electrocatalysts by at room temperature In the by the of CuBi-100 the electrochemical performance At the potential from −0.8 V to CuBi-100 excellent selectivity for formate and FE of more than The supreme at the potential of −1.0 electron that CuBi-100 on carbon and a The of CuBi-100 has

Enhancing electrochemical and electrocatalytic activities of polyaniline via co-doping with poly(styrene sulfonate) and gold

We present a controlled fabrication of selective ultrathin metal–organic framework (MOF) nanosheets as preassembling platforms, yolk–shell structured with a few-layered N-doped carbon (NC) shell-en...

Humic acid-based Fe/Ag bimetallic Fenton-like catalysts for efficient degradation of sulfadiazine in water.

Ethylene polymerization over novel organic magnesium based V/Ti bimetallic Ziegler-Natta Catalysts

We compared the corrosion resistance of aluminized steel with that of galvanized steel in acidic, neutral and alkaline solutions with pH value of 2-14 range at room temperature and 60°C.At room temperature, aluminized steel has remarkably superior corrosion resistance in the neutral and acidic solutions with pH less than 8. Especially, this steel is not entirely attacked by immersion for more than one month in the solutions with pH 6-8, and maintains its initial metallic luster. But this steel is attacked remarkably by alkaline solutions with pH value of more than 8.5. Galvanized steel has rather superior corrosion resistance in alkaline solutions of narrow pH value range only from 11 to 13. The surface of this steel is easily attacked even by neutral solution and its color changes to black, of course, it is more easily attacked in the acidic solutions with pH value of less than 7.At 60°C, aluminized steel shows the weight loss by corrosion as follows; 2g/m2/day in neutral solution, 20g/m2/day in pH 3 solution and 60g/m2/day in pH 2 solution. But the corrosion resistance of aluminized steel in neutral and acidic solution at 60°C is still more superior to that of galvanized steel in the same solutions than at room temperature. Galvanized steel shows at 60°C good resistance only in the solution with pH value of 12. When the pH value of the solution is over 12, with even its slight change, the corrosion resistance of this steel becomes worse remarkably, and the steel is severely attacked at the same temperature.

Tribocorrosion resistance of CoCrFeNiNbx laser-clad coatings in the neutral and acid solutions

Ultrasonic in-situ reduction preparation of SBA-15 loaded ultrafine RuCo alloy catalysts for efficient hydrogen storage of various LOHCs

Metallic nanoparticles have gained attention in technological fields, particularly photonics. The creation of silver/gold (Ag/Au) alloy NPs upon laser exposure of an assembly of these NPs was described. First, using the Nd: YAG pulsed laser ablation's second harmonic at the same average power and exposure time, Ag and Au NPs in distilled water were created individually. Next, the assembly of Ag and Au NP colloids was exposed again to the pulsed laser, and the effects were examined at different average powers and exposure times. Furthermore, Ag/Au alloy nanoparticles were synthesized with by raising the average power and exposure time. The absorption spectrum, average size, and shape of alloy NPs were obtained by using an ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer and transmission electron microscope instrument. Ag/Au alloy NPs have been obtained in the limit of quantum dots (<10 nm). The optical band gap energies of the Ag/Au alloy colloidal solutions were assessed for different Ag/Au alloy NP concentrations and NP sizes as a function of the exposure time and average power. The experimental data showed a trend toward an increasing bandgap with decreasing nanoparticle size. The nonlinear optical characteristics of Ag/Au NPs were evaluated and measured by the Z-scan technique using high repetition rate (80 MHz), femtosecond (100 fs), and near-infrared (NIR) (750-850 nm) laser pulses. In open aperture (OA) Z-scan measurements, Ag, Au, and Ag/AuNPs present reverse saturation absorption (RSA) behavior, indicating a positive nonlinear absorption (NLA) coefficient. In the close-aperture (CA) measurements, the nonlinear refractive (NLR) indices (n2) of the Ag, Au, and Ag/Au NP samples were ascribed to the self-defocusing effect, indicating an effective negative nonlinearity for the nanoparticles. The NLA and NLR characteristics of the Ag/Au NPs colloids were found to be influenced by the incident power and excitation wavelength. The optical limiting (OL) effects of the Ag/Au alloy solution at various excitation wavelengths were studied. The OL effect of alloy NPs is greater than that of monometallic NPs. The Ag/Au bimetallic nanoparticles were found to be more suitable for optical-limiting applications.

Novel Cr/Ti bimetallic polyethylene catalysts synthesized through introduction of chromium species into the (SiO2/MgR2/MgCl2)·TiClx Ziegler-Natta catalyst

ConspectusBimetallic catalysts hold promise in tailoring the catalytic activity and selectivity of transition metals for important chemical processes due to the synergistic coupling between the constituent elements that can connect catalytical active sites. However, it remains a challenge to construct an ideal bimetallic catalyst to study the respective or cooperative effects of the two transition metals within the bimetallic catalyst on the overall catalytic performance because multiple factors are always convoluted, such as the size dispersity of particles, the inhomogeneous structure, and the unknown exact location of the two metal elements in any particle. Therefore, almost all of the current studies give rise to the statistics of the overall catalytic performance from all of the particles in a bimetallic catalyst or at least the observed performance reflects an ensemble average of all metal atoms in a particle. Atomically precise metal nanoclusters have attracted catalysis scientists since their total structures (core plus surface) were solved by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, thereby providing unparalleled opportunities to build a precise correlation of catalyst structures with catalytic properties at an atomic level. Within this field, we are interested in identifying catalytically active sites and further constructing the active sites by an atom-by-atom manipulation, which are typically challenging for conventional particle-based heterogeneous catalysts and organometallics-based complex catalysts.In this Account, we mainly focus on the extensive efforts to fundamentally understand catalysis synergy in bimetallic nanocluster catalysts doped with heterometallic atoms. We first briefly describe the design rules and chemical synthesis of atomically precise bimetallic nanoclusters doped with heteroatoms including co-reduction, atom substitution, and reconstruction as typical synthesis strategies. We then put particular emphasis on the recent research toward the synergistic effects of surface/subsurface heteroatoms of the bimetallic nanoclusters on controlling the catalytic pathways, in which a series of examples showed that catalytically active sites can be dramatically tailored by the metal heteroatoms (Ru, Cu, Ni, Cd, etc.) located on the surface or subsurface of gold nanoclusters. Other cases indicated that the catalytic activity can be driven by surface heteroatom-ligand motifs of bimetallic nanoclusters. We also discuss the remote effects of nonsurface or kernel heteroatoms located in the cores of bimetallic nanoclusters on improving the catalytic reactions directly occurring on the catalyst surface. Finally, we anticipate that the advances in this research field would not only provide in-depth insight into the intraparticle synergism in bimetallic catalysts for understanding and controlling their catalytic reactivity but also provide valuable guidelines for high-performance catalysts that can be applied in industry.

Deciphering engineering principle of three-phase interface for advanced gas-involved electrochemical reactions

BACKGROUNDA microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is a bio‐hydrogen production device that uses electrochemically active bacteria on the anode combined with applied voltage to break down organic matter. However, the effects of element content on cathode reduction and cathode catalysts on bioanode activity remain unknown.RESULTSMEC cathodes with different content of Na2MoO4·2H2O (i.e. 0 g L−1 (Ni), 12.5 g L−1 (Ni–Mo 1), 25 g L−1 (Ni–Mo 2) and 37.5 g L−1 (Ni–Mo 3)) were fabricated by normal pulse voltammetry to evaluate the cathode performance. Nanoparticles of Ni electrode are crystalline NiO on the carbon fiber surface. Compared with the Ni electrode, the catalysts of Ni–Mo electrodes are composed of smaller crystalline NiO and amorphous Mo oxides. The results of electrochemical analysis confirmed that Ni–Mo 1 exhibited low exchange transfer resistance (148.72 Ω), high electrochemically active surface area and strong conductivity, resulting in optimal electrocatalysis performance. The newly fabricated electrodes are applied as cathodes in single‐chamber MEC reactors and inoculated with activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant. High peak current density determined using cyclic voltammetry of the bioanode indicated the strong electrochemical activity of electroactive bacteria in the bioanode of Ni–Mo 1. This is because the low resistance in the MECs could accelerate electron transfer and boost electrochemical reaction.CONCLUSIONSThe performance of cathodes with different Ni and Mo content in terms of electrochemical activity was evaluated. Consequently, the optimal cathode electrode in MECs was Ni–Mo 1. The obtained results reveal that the cathode affects the bioanode activity in MECs. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Integrating RuCo alloy in N-doped carbon nanofiber for efficient hydrogen evolution in alkaline media

The design and fabrication of catalysts with low-cost and high electrocatalytic activity for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) have remained challenging because of the sluggish kinetics of this reaction. The key to the pursuit of efficient electrocatalysts is to design them with high surface area and more active sites. In this work, we have successfully synthesized a highly stable and active NiCo2S4 nanowire array on a Ni-foam substrate (NiCo2S4 NW/NF) via a two-step hydrothermal synthesis approach. This NiCo2S4 NW/NF exhibits overpotential as low as 275 mV, delivering a current density of 20 mA cm-2 (versus reversible hydrogen electrode) with a low Tafel slope of 89 mV dec-1 and superior long-term stability for 20 h in 1M KOH electrolyte. The outstanding performance is ascribed to the inherent activity of the binder-free deposited, vertically aligned nanowire structure, which provides a large number of electrochemically active surface sites, accelerating electron transfer, and simultaneously enhancing the diffusion of electrolyte.