Abstract
CorrigendaCorrigendumPublished Online:01 Nov 2009https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.z9k-9775-corr.2009Original articleMoreSectionsPDF (152 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat Volume 102, August 2009Tolnai S, Englitz B, Scholbach J, Jost J, and Rübsamen R. Spike Transmission Delay at the Calyx of Held In Vivo: Rate Dependence, Phenomenological Modeling, and Relevance for Sound Localization. J Neurophysiol 102: , 2009. First published June 10, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00275.2009; http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/102/2/1206.During production, parts of Fig. 1 were shifted and gave a misleading illustration of the measurements depicted. The corrected version of Fig. 1 appears here.Fig. 1.Measuring the action potential transmission delay (ATD). A: extracellular recordings of responses to acoustic stimulations of principal cells of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) and their presynaptic input, the calyces of Held in the Mongolian gerbil. Due to the size of the calyx, extracellular recordings resemble complex waveforms that consist of the discharge of the calyx (prepotential) and the action potential (AP) of the principal cell. ATD was measured as the distance between the positive peak amplitudes of prepotential and postsynaptic AP. B: ATD measured under silent condition depends on the spontaneous discharge rate of a given MNTB unit. Significantly higher ATDspont are found in units with higher spontaneous rates. C: extracellular recording (top) of a unit's response to a sequence of pure tones (bottom, duration: 100 ms, interstimulus interval: 100 ms, stimulus amplitudes in decreasing order, not to scale). D: mean complex waveforms of the same unit as in C for 5 different ATDs (380–460 μs, black to red) aligned to the prepotential (top) and to the postsynaptic AP (bottom). Individual complex waveforms of ATDs in a 10 μs bin were pooled into each mean complex waveform. E and F: changes in ATD and firing rate correlate (same unit as in C). ATD (E) changes as a function of intensity and frequency of the acoustic stimulus and the firing rate (F) show a very similar profile.Download figureDownload PowerPointThis article has no references to display. Download PDF Previous Back to Top FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationRelated ArticlesSpike Transmission Delay at the Calyx of Held In Vivo: Rate Dependence, Phenomenological Modeling, and Relevance for Sound Localization 01 Aug 2009Journal of Neurophysiology More from this issue > Volume 102Issue 5November 2009Pages 3077-3077 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2009 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/jn.z9k-9775-corr.2009History Published online 1 November 2009 Published in print 1 November 2009 Metrics
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
