Abstract
The authors regret an error that appeared in this article. In the study by Alberts (2005) cited in the paper, the scores for standard deviation (SD) and standard error were interchanged. The correct SD for the osteopathic treatment is 5.49 and for the control treatment 1.5. The corrected forest plots are displayed below. This error has no impact on the conclusions of the review. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Osteopathic treatment versus untreated and PFMT Osteopathic treatment versus untreated Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in womenJournal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesVol. 17Issue 1PreviewBecause of its prevalence and impact on women's well-being, and its high financial costs, female LUTS is an important health problem that requires serious attention from health professionals. Full-Text PDF
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
