Abstract
Theorem 2.2 stated a monoidal isomorphism between the comodule categories of two bialgebroids in a Hopf algebroid. The proof of Theorem 2.2 was based on the journal version of Brzezinski (Ann Univ Ferrara Sez VII (NS) 51:15–27, 2005, Theorem 2.6), whose proof turned out to contain an unjustified step. Here we show that all other results in our paper remain valid if we drop unverified Theorem 2.2, and return to an earlier definition of a comodule of a Hopf algebroid that distinguishes between comodules of the two constituent bialgebroids.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
