Abstract
We start from the provocative contention that if an investor did not rebalance earlier this year (2020), then that investor does not have an asset allocation policy. More specifically, that investor does not have a rebalancing policy to preserve their asset allocation. We then work backward from a presumption that a correction needs to induce a rebalancing trade and develop an algebraic solution for the width of the rebalancing range to ensure it does so. Across a range of reasonable assumptions, rebalancing ranges need to be tighter than traditional norms. TOPICS:Statistical methods, portfolio construction, risk management Key Findings • Wealth managers promising benefits from rebalancing need to deliver on that promise. • Corrections and bear markets, surprisingly, do not trigger traditional rebalancing ranges. • We develop a nontrivial analytical expression for rebalancing ranges that will trigger in a stock market correction and find they encourage much tighter rebalancing ranges.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.