Abstract

K. Hiraga [1] has informed the author that the proof of Theorem 5 given in [2] is incorrect, and he has also supplied a correct proof for this result. In what follows the author will present, with insignificant modifications, the example and the argument of Hiraga's letter. First, as Hiraga points out, the numbers C(n) of [2, 3.28] are not in general finite, as the following example makes clear. We employ the notation of [2]. Let 7T denote a prime element of the p-field Q. For the moment take G = GL3, P the upper triangular subgroup, and N the lower triangular unipotent subgroup of G. The set F of [2, ?2], a fundamental set for the Cartan decomposition of G /Z7 consists of the set of matrices El-#2 ~0 0 m=O IT-F2 0 [ 0 0 1

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.