Abstract
This article responds to the Cork Committee report which discusses in part the criminal law relating to fraudulent debtors. The way that these issues are addressed by the committee is inadequate and contains a number of inconsistencies. The author outlines a number of the defects in the current law including issues with wording, vagueness and uncertainty, procedural and evidentiary issues, and the lack of discussion about the role of criminal law in this sphere. These defects are then examined in relation to a range of contexts such as fraudulent transfer, fraudulent concealment and removal, and gambling. These are just some of the issues that can be seen in this area of the law. Abstract by Rose Goss.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
