Corneal surface reconstruction for the chemical injured eye by transplanting autologous cultivated limbal epithelial sheet “Nepic®”

Clinical Trial of Autologous Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Cell Sheet Transplantation for Patients with Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

This study describes a novel surgical technique of limbal transplantation, which combines the benefits of existing techniques while avoiding their difficulties. Six patients with unilateral and total limbal stem cell...

Background : Corneal epithelium is renewed by stem cells (SC) that reside at the corneal limbus. Reduced number of SC or their abnormal function lead to the ocular surface disease called limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), characterized by corneal conjunctivalization, vascularization, persistent epithelial defects, chronic inflammation, and loss of vision. In a case of total unilateral LSCD, autologous transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells (LESC) from the healthy eye is needed. We describe the surgical technique of choice for autologous limbal transplantation, called conjunctival limbal autograft (CLAU) that we combined with amniotic membrane (AM) use. We present the results of CLAU in three patients with total unilateral LSCD due to chemical injury. Methods : Autologous limbal transplantation CLAU begins with the removal of fibrovascular pannus from the diseased corneal surface and the harvesting of two conjunctival-limbal grafts from the healthy eye. The grafts are then transplanted on to the limbal area of the recipient eye. AM is used as a patch to cover the denuded cornea and limbal grafts, as well as a barrier preventing the conjunctival epithelium from encroaching on to the temporal and nasal side of the corneal surface. In the donor eye, AM is used to cover the donor sites. CLAU with the use of AM was performed in 3 patients with unilateral LSCD due to chemical eye injury. In one patient limbal transplantation was combined with symblepharon lysis for entropium repair. In all cases AM was removed 3–6 days postoperatively to assess the growth of new epithelium from the limbal grafts. In all patients the ocular surface was covered with another AM until the cornea was completely epithelized and the new epithelium stable. In one patient the corneal regrafting and cataract removal was performed subsequently. Results : CLAU was successful in 2 patients and partially successful in 1 patient during the follow up. In all cases the growth of new epithelium from the limbal grafts was noted on day 3–6 after CLAU. The cornea was completely epithelized within 2 weeks in 2 patients and after 35 days in one patient. In two patients the corneal epithelium remained clear, smooth and stable during the follow up of 3.5 years and 4 months, respectively. In one patient, uneven epithelium probably representing a mosaic of corneal and conjunctival cells was noted in the central corneal region, where a small corneal ulcer developed 5 months after CLAU. In donor eyes no postoperative complications were noted, the donor sites epithelized within few days. Conclusions : Autologous limbal transplantation according to CLAU surgical technique combined with the use of AM is a successful and safe therapy for restoring corneal surface in total unilateral LSCD after chemical injury. It enables further surgical procedures for restoring the vision such as corneal transplantation and cataract surgery.

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of conjunctival autograft (CAG) versus simple limbal epithelial transplant (SLET) for management of unilateral partial limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).MethodsThis retrospective, comparative, interventional case series evaluated 30 eyes of 30 patients with unilateral partial LSCD. After corneal pannus dissection, 17 patients underwent CAG where graft was harvested from the ipsilateral or contralateral eye, while 13 patients underwent SLET where limbal biopsy was harvested from the contralateral eye. The primary outcome measure was anatomical success in the form of restoration of a completely epithelised, stable, and avascular corneal surface at last follow-up.ResultsBoth groups were comparable in terms of age at time of surgery, preoperative best-corrected visual acuity, median duration since injury, number of clock hours of limbus involved, and number of previous surgeries performed. The most common etiology for LSCD was chemical burns in both groups. The median duration of post-operative follow-up was 5.6 months [interquartile range [(IQR): 3.6–15.1] in the CAG group versus 6.2 months (IQR: 4.5–12.2) in the SLET group (p=0.75)]. The anatomical success rates were 86.5 ± 8.9% in the CAG group and 28.3 ± 13.7% in the SLET group at final follow-up visit (p = 0.025). Most failures in both groups occurred within the first 8 months after surgery.ConclusionFor eyes with unilateral partial LSCD secondary to chemical burns, CAG is a safe and effective method for restoring the corneal epithelium. Limbal transplantation may not be necessary for the treatment of partial LSCD.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) technique, which reduces the risk of iatrogenic limbal stem cell deficiency in the donor eye. Four patients with total unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency received a limbal graft, measuring 4 mm × 2 mm, from the contralateral healthy eye in a single surgical procedure. The graft was divided into 10-20 pieces and distributed on the corneal surface. At 6-month follow-up, a completely avascular corneal epithelial surface was obtained in two patients, and there was improvement in visual acuity in one patient. The limbal grafts did not adhere to the cornea in one patient. No serious complications related to the surgery were observed in this study.

Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty After Autologous Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation for Ocular Surface Burns

Corneal surface reconstruction - a short review

Comparison of Limbal and Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation in Corneal Surface Reconstruction in Rabbits

To evaluate limbal graft transplantation success in pediatric patients with chemical injury-induced limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) using the 'LSCD Working Group' staging system. Medical records of 11 eyes of 11 children who underwent limbal graft transplantation (limbal autograft/limbal allograft) were included. Surgical success was defined as improvement in the post-operative 1st year LSCD stage. The mean age was 12 ± 5 (4-17) years. Causative agent was alkaline in 4(36.4%) and acid in 3(27.2%) patients. Limbal autograft was performed in 9 (81.8%) eyes with unilateral LSCD, and allograft transplantation was performed in 2 (18.2%) eyes with bilateral LSCD. The mean follow-up time was 33.89 ± 30.73 (12-102.33) months. The overall limbal graft transplantation success rate was 72.7%. Among 9 patients who receive limbal autograft, 8 had improvement in post-operative LSCD stage, 1 had stable LSCD stage. Of the 2 patients who receive limbal allograft, post-operative LSCD stage remained the same in 1 and worsened in 1 patient. The mean time between injury and the surgery was 30.47 ± 30.08 (7-108.47) months. Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 3 (27.2%) of 11 patients following limbal graft transplantation. Management of LSCD in children is challenging and appears to be somewhat different from that of adults. Limited data in the literature indicate that cultivated or simple limbal epithelial transplantations (CLET/SLET) are primarily preferred in children. Although the tendency to take small tissue from the healthy eye is noteworthy, conventional limbal allograft and autograft transplantations also show promising results without any further complications in at least 1year follow-up period.

Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency—Demography and Underlying Causes

Limbal stem-cell deficiency by ocular trauma or diseases causes corneal opacification and visual loss. Recent attempts have been made to fabricate corneal epithelial graft constructs, but the technology is still evolving. We have developed a novel cell-sheet manipulation technology using temperature-responsive culture surfaces to generate functional, cultivated corneal epithelial cell sheet grafts. Human or rabbit limbal stem cells were cocultured with mitomycin C-treated 3T3 feeder layers on temperature-responsive culture dishes at 37 degrees C. Cell sheets were harvested from the dishes after 2 weeks by reducing temperature to 20 degrees C. Histologic analyses, immunoblotting, and colony-forming assay were performed to characterize the cell sheets. Autologous transplantation was undertaken to reconstruct the corneal surfaces of rabbits with experimentally induced limbal stem cell deficiencies. Multilayered corneal epithelial sheets were harvested intact simply by reducing the temperature, without the use of proteases. Cell-cell junctions and extracellular matrix on the basal side of the sheet, critical to sheet integrity and function, remained intact. A viable population of corneal progenitor cells, close in number to that originally seeded, was found in the sheets. Harvested sheets were easily manipulated, transplantable without any carriers, and readily adhesive to corneal stroma so that suturing was not required. Corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits was highly successful. Cell sheet engineering technology allows us to create intact, transplantable corneal epithelial cell sheets that retain stem cells from limbal stem cells expanded ex vivo. Our research indicates highly promising clinical capabilities for our bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet.

To determine if human amniotic membrane transplantation or limbal stem cell transplantation is effective to restore the corneal surface with partial or total limbal stem cell deficiency, respectively, caused by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity after glaucoma surgeries. Partial and total limbal stem cell deficiency was confirmed by impression cytology as the cause of reduced vision and corneal surface breakdown in a 69-year-old man and a 67-year-old man, respectively, who both had received a total of 105 mg 5-FU injections. Amniotic membrane transplantation or conjunctival limbal autograft was performed for corneal surface reconstruction, respectively. For a period of 15 months of follow-up, the visual acuity improved, and their corneal surfaces remained avascular, smooth, and without recurrence of limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal stem cell deficiency can occur as a late complication for patients receiving 5-FU after glaucoma filtering surgeries. Partial limbal stem cell deficiency can be treated with amniotic membrane transplantation alone, whereas limbal transplantation must be considered as an alternative for total limbal stem cell deficiency to restore the corneal surface integrity and vision.

The corneal epithelium is maintained by a population of stem cells known as limbal stem cells (LSCs) due to their location in the basal layer of the outer border of the cornea known as the limbus. Treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) has been achieved with transplantation of ex vivo expanded LSCs taken from a small biopsy of limbus. This is a relatively new technique, and as such, specific national or international guidance has yet to be established. Because of the lack of such specific guidance, our group has sought to minimize any risk to the patient by adopting certain modifications to the research methodologies in use at present. These include the replacement of all non-human animal products from the culture system and the production of all reagents and cultures under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. In addition, for the first time, a strictly defined uniform group of patients with total unilateral LSCD and no other significant ocular conditions has been used to allow the success or failure of treating LSCD to be attributable directly to the proposed stem cell therapy. A prospectively designed study with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was used to enroll patients from our database of patients with unilateral LSCD. Eight eyes of eight consecutive patients with unilateral total LSCD treated with ex vivo expanded autologous LSC transplant on human amniotic membrane (HAM) with a mean follow-up of 19 (RANGE) months were included in the study. Postoperatively, satisfactory ocular surface reconstruction with a stable corneal epithelium was obtained in all eyes (100%). At last examination, best corrected visual acuity improved in five eyes and remained unchanged in three eyes. Vision impairment and pain scores improved in all patients (p < .05). This study demonstrates that transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial stem cells cultured on HAM without the use of non-human animal cells or products is a safe and effective method of reconstructing the corneal surface and restoring useful vision in patients with unilateral total LSCD.

Author’s reply

Amniotic membrane transplantation with conjunctival limbal autograft for total limbal stem cell deficiency