Copyright Page

Imagining a Place for Sustainability Management: An Early Career Call for Action

Extract Translated by John O’DonnellUniversity of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by The Regents of the University of CaliforniaLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Nono, Luigi, author. | De Benedictis, Angela Ida, editor. | Rizzardi, Veniero, editor.Title: Nostalgia for the future : Luigi Nono’s selected writings and interviews / edited by Angela Ida De Benedictis and Veniero Rizzardi.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Series: California Studies in 20th-Century Music ; 21 | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2017053883 (print) | lccn 2017056877 (ebook) | isbn 9780520965027 () | isbn 9780520291195 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520291201 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: Nono, Luigi—Criticism and interpretation. | Music—20th century—History and criticism.Classification: lcc ml410.n667 (ebook) | lcc ml410. n667 a25 2018 (print) | ddc 780.92—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017053883Manufactured in the United States of America25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by Travis VoganLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Vogan, Travis, author.Title: ABC Sports : the rise and fall of network sports television / Travis Vogan.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2018017673 (print) | lccn 2018021121 (ebook) | isbn 9780520966260 (ebook) | isbn 9780520292956 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520292963 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: ABC Sports. | Television broadcasting of sports—United States—20th century.Classification: lcc gv742.3 (ebook) |lcc gv742.3 .v6155 2018 (print) | ddc 070.449796—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/201801767327 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by The Regents of the University of CaliforniaLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Miller, Susan L., author.Title: Journeys : resilience and growth for survivors of intimate partner abuse / Susan L. Miller.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Series: Gender and justice ; 5 | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2017054876 (print) | lccn 2017059022 (ebook) | isbn 9780520961463 (Epub) | isbn 9780520286085 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520286108 (pbk : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: Intimate partner violence—United States—Case studies. | Resilience (Personality trait) | Posttraumatic growth—United States—Case studies. | Abused women—United States—Case studies.Classification: lcc hv6626.2 (ebook) | lcc hv6626.2 .M555 2018 (print) | ddc 362.82/924—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/201705487627 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by Daniel RenfrewLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Renfrew, Daniel, 1974- author.Title: Life without lead : contamination, crisis, and hope in Uruguay / Daniel Renfrew.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Series: Critical environments: nature, science, and politics | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2018010667 (print) | lccn 2018013589 (ebook) | isbn 9780520968240 (Ebook) | isbn 9780520295469 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520295476 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: Lead poisoning—Uruguay—20th century. | Environmentalism—Uruguay—20th century.Classification: lcc ra1231.L4 (ebook) | lcc ra1231.L4 R39 2018 (print) | ddc 615.9/2568809895—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/201801066727 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by Anthony W. FontesLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Fontes, Anthony W., author.Title: Mortal doubt : transnational gangs and social order in Guatemala City / Anthony W. Fontes.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Series: Atelier: ethnographic inquiry in the twenty-first century ; 1 | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2018014806 (print) | lccn 2018018645 (ebook) | isbn 9780520969599 (ebook) | isbn 9780520297081 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520297098 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: Gangs—Guatemala—Guatemala. | Violence—Guatemala—Guatemala. | Guatemala (Guatemala)—Social conditions.Classification: lcc hv6439.g92 (ebook) | lcc hv6439.g92 f66 2018 (print) | ddc 364.106/60972811—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018014806Manufactured in the United States of America26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 Megan RyburnLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Ryburn, Megan, author.Title: Uncertain citizenship : everyday practices of Bolivian migrants in Chile / Megan Ryburn.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2018014113 (print) | lccn 2018017092 (ebook) | isbn 9780520970793 (ebook) | isbn 9780520298767 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520298774 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: Bolivia—Emigration and immigration. | Immigrants—Bolivia—Social conditions. | Foreign workers, Bolivian—Chile—Social conditions. | Bolivians—Chile—Social conditions.Classification: lcc hd8268.5.b65 (ebook) | lcc hd8268.5.b65 r93 2018 (print) | ddc 305.868/84083—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/201801411327 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by The Regents of the University of CaliforniaLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Conde, Maite, 1971- author.Title: Foundational films : early cinema and modernity in Brazil / Maite Conde.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] | Includes filmography, bibliographical references, and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2018010665 (print) | lccn 2018012427 (ebook) | isbn 9780520964884 (Epub) | isbn 9780520290983 (cloth : alk. paper) | isbn 9780520290990 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: LCSH: Motion pictures—Brazil—History—20th century. | Motion pictures—Brazil—History—19th century. | Silent films—Brazil. | Brazil—In motion pictures.Classification: lcc pn1993.5.b6 (ebook) | lcc pn1993.5.b6 c66 2018 (print) | ddc 791.4309810904—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/201801066527 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

The integration of natural and social sciences has been recognized as a key aspect of Earth System (E.S.) research, a cross-disciplinary field involving the study of the geosphere, the biosphere, and society (IGBP, 2006; Leemans et al., 2009; Pfeiffer, 2008; Reid et al., 2010; Young, 2008). Because of societal and political correlates between environmental change and socio-economic development, the study of the Earth System has been increasingly ascribed social and political dimensions emphasizing the need for greater collaboration between the social and natural sciences (Beven, 2011; Kates et al., 2001; Leemans et al., 2009; Reid et al., 2010; Saloranta, 2001; Shackley et al., 1998). The problem of inter-disciplinary articulation between the social and natural sciences is not specific to E.S. research, and its challenges can be traced back to the very origins of the notions of science and social science (e.g. Comte, 1830-1842; de Alvarenga et al., 2011; Latour, 2000, 2004). To a degree, these challenges could be explained in terms of the increasing gulf between two cultures – those of the sciences and the humanities – as suggested by C.P. Snow (1905-1980) in an instigating essay (Snow, 1990 [1959]), due to the high specialization in science and education, and, not less important, to a “tendency to let our social forms to crystallise” (Snow, 1990: 172). More to the point, the increasing importance attributed to the problem has motivated a growing number of analyses concerning the high level of specialization and fragmentation of science and university education (e.g. de Alvarenga et al., 2011; Moraes, 2005; Snow, 1990), but also the societal and political questions concerning research agendas (e.g. Alves, 2008; Kates et al., 2001; Latour, 2000, 2004; Schor, 2008), the disparities between developed and developing countries not just in affluence level, but also in research capacity (Kates et al, 2001; Pfeiffer, 2008; Schor, 2008), and, finally, from a more methodological point of view, the multiplicity of theoreticomethodological perspectives admitted by the social sciences (e.g. de Alvarenga et al., 2011; Floriani et al, 2011; Giddens, 2001; Leis, 2011; Moraes, 2005; Oliveira Filho, 1976; Raynaut & Zanoni, 2011; Weffort, 2006). Yet, in the E.S. field the problem of bringing together social and natural sciences has been a permanent and still unresolved challenge (Alves et al., 2007; Alves, 2008; Geoghegan et al.,

Background. Literature indicates that in academic writing, authors are expected to demonstrate a noticeable stance so that they can make their meaning clear. Therefore, differences between native and non-native writers along with cross-disciplinary academic writing assume great significance. Purpose. The interactional, dialogic, and reflective nature of academic writing requires writers to utilize stance-establishing tools in their writing, the most prominent ones being stance nouns. In addition, the that-clause construction plays a vital role in conveying the author’s stance. Studies that compare L1 Turkish writers of English and L1 English writers regarding academic writing are rather scarce. As such, the present paper aims to analyze L1 Turkish writers of English and L1 English writers in eight disciplines from natural and social sciences in terms of the use of stance nouns in that-clause constructions. Methods. The study employs Jiang and Hyland's (2016) functional classification model in exploring the nominal stance in cross-disciplinary writing of L1 Turkish writers of English and L1 English writers. To this end, journals with high impact in eight disciplines from social and natural sciences were scanned and a total of 320 articles were included in the corpus. The social sciences included in the present study cover applied linguistics, history, psychology, and sociology while the natural sciences cover medicine, engineering, astronomy, and biology. In total, a corpus of 2.232.164 words was formed. Results and Implications. The study found significant differences not only in terms of natural and social sciences but also in terms of L1/L2 distinction. In addition, a secondary purpose of the study was to see whether writers in social and natural sciences differed in terms of empiricist and interpretive rationality. The results indicated that writers in social sciences tended to use more status and cognition nouns, indicating that they tend to be more interpretive. With significant differences between Turkish and English writers from a cross-disciplinary perspective, the present study offers important insights into how writers weave their stance in academic writing. Moreover, the present study also confirmed that writers in social sciences, whether L1 or L2, tend to use more stance nouns compared with writers in natural sciences.

Editorial

Arien Mack Editor’s Introduction WHEN I FIRST BEGAN TO DISCUSS THE THEME OF “ERRORS” WITH MY coeditor for this special issue, Gerald Holton, the question arose as to whether the kinds of “fruitful” mistakes that occur in the natural sciences also occur in the social sciences. While the degree of resem­ blance between the natural and social sciences has long been the subject of discussion within the social sciences themselves, I do not think the question has been much discussed in these particular terms. Since this issue ofSocialResearch attests to the presence of fruitful errors in the natural sciences, we invited several distinguished social scien­ tists to address the question of whether such errors occur in the social sciences. Many of the social scientists from whom I initially requested advice pointed out that, unlike physical laws in the natural sciences, “laws” in the social sciences—if there are any—are often contin­ gent and change as the social and cultural contexts change. In addi­ tion, two of the respondents pointed out, I think correctly, that the prim ary problem in the social sciences is not so much the validity of the claims of social scientists, which may or not be correct, but rather the consequences of those claims for social policies. An obvi­ ous instance of this was Cyril Burt’s claim about genetic differences in intelligence, which led to discriminatory immigration rules and other bad social policy. Fortunately for us at Sodal Research despite the general consen­ sus that “fruitful” errors were not characteristic of the social sciences, several distinguished social scientists agreed to explore the question of social research Vol 72 : No 1: Spring 2005 xl errors in the social sciences and have written interestingly about it for this issue. These articles stand as illuminating complements to the arti­ cles by historians of the natural sciences that also appear, and clarify one more dimension on which the social and natural sciences differ. Arien Mack xii social research ...

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2019 by The Regents of the University of CaliforniaLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNames: Waters, Rob, author.Title: Thinking black : Britain, 1964–1985 / Rob Waters.Description: Oakland, California : University of California Press, [2018] |Series: Berkeley series in British studies ; 14 | Includes bibliographicalreferences and index. |Identifiers: lccn 2018020264 (print) | lccn 2018024304 (ebook) |isbn 9780520967205 | isbn 9780520293847 (cloth : alk. paper) |isbn 9780520293854 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subjects: lcsh: Blacks—Great Britain—History—20th century. | GreatBritain—Race relations—History—20th century. | Radicalism—GreatBritain—History—20th century. | Blacks—Great Britain—Politics andgovernment—20th century.Classification: lcc da125.n4 (ebook) | lcc da125.n4 w38 2018 (print) |ddc 305.896/04109045—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018020264Manufactured in the United States of America26 25 24 23 22 21 20 1910 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Extract University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu.University of California PressOakland, California© 2018 by The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCataloging-in-Publication data for this title is on file with theLibrary of Congressisbn 978-0-520-29454-727 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1810 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1Cover images—complete captions and credit informationLeft image: Simmons (mining agent, law agent, and public accountant) and family outside his bark hut, Gulgong area, New South Wales, circa 1870–5. American & Australasian Photographic Company, ON 4 Box 4 No 18368. Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales.Center image: View of San Francisco Harbor, 1851. McIntyre, Sterling C., photographer. Half-plate daguerreotype, DAG no. 1330. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division.Right image: An African-American miner and a Chinese miner working underground at Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. This image was probably taken underground at the Catherine Reef Claimholders Company mine in the late 1880s. Photograph courtesy of James Lerk, with assistance from Colin Barr.Originally from the F.W. Palmer collection.

Social Science and Its Frontiers Myron P. Gutmann (bio) Mark Solovey,Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the “Other Sciences” at the National Science Foundation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2020. X+ 398pp. Figures, notes, index. $50.00. Americans often date the emergence of a strong commitment to government support of science to the launch of the Soviet Union’s Sputnik 1 satellite in October 1957. That event certainly spurred policy decisions that increased federal investments in education and science, and thus is an appropriate starting point for the popular narrative about science. At the same time, policy developments of the Sputnik era built on earlier events, widely recognized by historians of science. That perspective starts the story with the presentation in July 1946 of Vannever Bush’s report, Science, The Endless Frontier, to President Truman, advocating for a large, organized federal investment in scientific research, based on the role of science and technology in the Second World War. Early efforts to enact legislation based on the Bush report failed (Truman vetoed the first bill that passed because it lacked presidential control over the appointment of the Foundation’s leadership), but in 1950 Truman signed the National Science Foundation Act, establishing an enduring basis for publicly—especially federally—funded scientific research in the United States. The debates about the creation of the National Science Foundation pitted progressives against conservatives and advocates of public and congressional control of science against advocates of exclusive control by scientists.1 One of the topics of debate—although hardly the loudest—was whether the social sciences would be included in the Foundation’s charge.2 Vannever Bush was opposed to their inclusion, sometimes arguing that they should be supported by a separate organization; on the other side, Democratic West Virginia Senator Harley M. Kilgore, a leading sponsor of a more progressive approach, supported their inclusion in the Foundation’s mission. In the end, the compromise legislation that Truman signed in 1950 did not include support for the social sciences, but at the same time did not prohibit such support. The Foundation did not totally exclude the social sciences for long; it hired sociologist Harry Alpert in 1953, and in 1954 introduced a first, extremely modest, program to support the linkage between the social and natural sciences. [End Page 396] The first Social Sciences Division was not established until 1960 (in an era in which the Foundation was divided into four scientific divisions reflecting major disciplinary categories). Later, when the Foundation was reorganized into seven directorates (three of them disciplinary, one for education, and three for administrative activities) in 1975, the Divisions of Social Sciences and Behavioral and Neural Sciences were part of an expanded Directorate for Biological, Behavioral and Social Sciences (p. 179). Only in 1991–92 did the Foundation establish a separate Directorate for the Social, Behavioral and Economic (SBE) Sciences, an organizational status that still exists today. The road from the origin of the Foundation to the creation of the SBE Directorate was not linear, with ups and downs in support for the social and behavioral sciences mostly reflecting political and institutional challenges. This history spanning the period from the first discussions of the National Science Foundation through the end of the 1980s (with an added discussion of recent events and recommendations for the future) is the topic of Mark Solovey’s Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the “Other Sciences” at the National Science Foundation. In this book he builds on his earlier book, Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America (2013), on extensive archival research, and on interviews with surviving participants. Social Science for What? is an impressive accomplishment, capturing the connections between partisan politics, scientific inquiry, tensions among scientific disciplines, and the institutional development of the Foundation. It is instructive for all readers, including for me, who served for four years (2009–13) as one of the Foundation’s Assistant Directors and head of the Directorate for Social Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE). Social Science for What? articulates consistent themes that define social science at NSF, along with a lively narrative arc. To define that arc, Solovey divides the main...