Abstract
ABSTRACT Copers are individuals who have had a lateral ankle sprain but have no history of recurrent lateral ankle sprain, residual symptoms, or functional disability. Copers have shown no significant difference in lower limb kinematics in landing for proactive conditions compared with a control (CTR) group. However, the copers (CPR) group has shown differences compared to CTR and chronic ankle instability (CAI) groups for dynamic balance conditions, suggesting that the trunk may compensate for foot instability during shock absorption. This study aimed to examine the differences in the kinematics and kinetics among CPR, CAI and CTR groups in reactive and proactive single-leg landing tasks. Participants were physically active adults with CAI (n = 14), CPR (n = 14), and CTR (n = 14), who performed proactive and reactive single-leg landings. The lower limb, trunk kinematics, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) peak value, and the time to minimum peak vGRF were analysed. It might be conceivable that the CPR group could absorb vGRF efficiently by increasing the trunk flexion angle and increasing the time to reach the minimum peak vGRF regardless of landing condition. The results suggest that evaluating the movements of the entire body, including the ankle and trunk, is essential.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
