Abstract
Convergence behavior of the previously proposed time-delay digital tanlock loop (TDTL) is analyzed. The approach is built on the actual number of steps required for the convergence of the phase error to its steady-state value. Unlike the first-order conventional digital tanlock loop (CDTL), the Lipschitz bound of TDTL is not a tight limit for the actual convergence time, especially for higher values of the absolute difference between the initial and the steady-state phase errors. For a frequency step input, the first-order TDTL locks faster than CDTL under suitable arrangement of the loop parameters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
