Conventional vs Wavefront-guided LASIK Using the LADARVision4000 Excimer Laser

Abstract

To compare outcomes after LASIK surgery using the conventional LADARVision4000 laser and the wavefront-guided LADARWave CustomCornea wavefront system. A prospective study was performed involving 140 myopic eyes receiving conventional or CustomCornea LASIK between May and October 2003. The preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction was limited to myopia < or = -7.00 diopters (D). The preoperative manifest cylinder was limited to < or = -2.50 D of astigmatism. Patients were evaluated for 3 months following surgery. Results evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, dilated wavefront measurements, contrast sensitivity, and patient responses to subjective questionnaires. For the CustomCornea eyes at 3 months, 80% (70/87) had UCVA > or = 20/20 and 95% (83/87) had UCVA > or = 20/25. For the conventional eyes at 3 months, 45% (9/20) had UCVA > or = 20/20 and 80% (16/20) had UCVA > or = 20/25. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 85% (74/87) of the CustomCornea eyes and 55% (11/20) of the conventional eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of their intended correction. At 1 and 3 months, the CustomCornea treated eyes had a statistically significant lower mean increase in higher order aberrations than conventionally treated eyes (P < .05). CustomCornea wavefront-guided LASIK surgery appears safe and effective and provides clinical benefits that appear to exceed those of conventional LADARVision surgery.