Abstract

Skull stripping in brain magnetic resonance volume has recently been attracting attention due to an increased demand to develop an efficient, accurate, and general algorithm for diverse datasets of the brain. Accurate skull stripping is a critical step for neuroimaging diagnostic systems because neither the inclusion of non-brain tissues nor removal of brain parts can be corrected in subsequent steps, which results in unfixed error through subsequent analysis. The objective of this review article is to give a comprehensive overview of skull stripping approaches, including recent deep learning-based approaches. In this paper, the current methods of skull stripping have been divided into two distinct groups—conventional or classical approaches, and convolutional neural networks or deep learning approaches. The potentials of several methods are emphasized because they can be applied to standard clinical imaging protocols. Finally, current trends and future developments are addressed giving special attention to recent deep learning algorithms.

Highlights

  • Among the various medical imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is one of the most prevalent image acquisitions performed in the diagnostic centers and hospitals.The acquisition of a brain MRI scan is noninvasive and nondestructive

  • Clinicians and practitioners still depend on manual skull stripping due to the communication gap and lack of interaction between the researchers and practitioners

  • The objective of several skull stripping tools is to do only the research, and they are barely useful for clinicians

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among the various medical imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is one of the most prevalent image acquisitions performed in the diagnostic centers and hospitals. The whole brain skull stripping is a laborious task due to low contrast images, obscure boundaries of the extraction becomes more challenging and limited in the presence of varying acquisition parameters or brain in the MRI, and the absence of intensity standardization [22]. For skull stripping in brain MRIs, manual brain and non-brain segmentation methods are considered more robust and accurate than semi or fully automatic methods. Generally,on manual delineation of the treated as the stripping is to draw the boundaries brain MRIs and isolate thebrain braintissue tissue is from the skull Is commonly utilized to to in MRI volume is treated as the “ground truth” or “gold standard,” and is commonly utilized validate other semi-automatic and automatic skull stripping methods.

Publicly Available Brain MRI Datasets
LPBA40
MRBrainS13
40 T1 W images images
Histogram
Deformable Surface Model-Based Methods
Atlas or Library-Based Methods
Region Growing and Watershed Methods
Meta-Algorithms and Hybrid Methods
Methods
CNN-Based or Deep Learning-Based Approaches
Based Methods
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.