Abstract
Controversy surrounds the selection of orbital implants used for the repair of orbital blow-out fractures. No less than 20 alloplastic, autogenous, resorbable or integrated materials have been reported for use in these repairs. Little information is available comparing the benefits, complications or selection criteria for these materials. This brief review will address the types of implants available, their reported complications, and potential clinical advantages and disadvantages to construct a rational approach for the selection of an implant for orbital fracture repair.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
