Abstract
The article considers controlling as a tool of crisis management of an enterprise, the main task of which is to provide crisis response (management) with an up-to-date information and analytical base. It is defined that anti-crisis management of an enterprise is a complex of measures to analyse and assess potential crises, develop anti-crisis action plans, identify signs of crises, implement action plans to prevent and overcome crises, eliminate their consequences and prevent crises in the future. The goals and objectives of crisis management of an enterprise are defined as follows: foreseeing the crisis and adequate preparation for it; hindering dangerous factors of crisis; managing the dynamics of crisis development; ensuring the vitality of the enterprise in crisis state; mitigating the negative consequences of crisis; using factors and consequences of crisis for the enterprise development. The main elements of controlling (object, purpose, objectives and tools) in the short and long term are described. The general and special functions of controlling are given. It is proposed to distinguish such function of controlling as crisis response. As a controlling functionality, a list of procedures performed by the controlling system was formulated and justified, which made up the crisis response complex: communication, coordination, cooperation, completing, converting, complementing and cogeneration. It has been substantiated that according to the crisis response complex the main role is assigned to communication. It is determined that the crisis response complex should act according to the types of crises that exist and may arise in the activities of the enterprise. A list of classic controlling principles has been provided and supplemented by such ones as the business responsibility and the anti-crisis principle. The principle of business responsibility provides for that the controlling service, while collecting, processing, analysing data and providing the basis for making certain management decisions, must be responsible for the reliability and relevance of the information provided. The second proposed principle (anti-crisis) provides for the prediction and anticipation of turning points in the activities of the enterprise and crisis response.
Highlights
A list of procedures performed by the controlling system was formulated and justified, which made up the crisis response complex: communication, coordination, cooperation, completing, converting, complementing and cogeneration
We propose to introduce such principles of controlling as business responsibility and crisis-prevention approach
The former implies that the controlling department, while collecting, processing, analyzing data and providing the basis for making certain management decisions, should be responsible for the accuracy and relevance of the information provided, since the distortion of data on one of the enterprises may, when considered in consolidation, distort the overall situation of the entire group
Summary
Е. н., професор, професор кафедри економіки, Херсонська філія Національного університету кораблебудування імені адмірала Макарова, м. М. Огорь, асистент кафедри економіки, Херсонська філія Національного університету кораблебудування імені адмірала Макарова, м.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.