Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound LI-RADS for Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment in Liver Tumor: A Pictorial Review Based on LR-TR v2024

Evolution of Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Liver Cancer.

Despite the development of novel therapies, breast cancer mortality remains high. Improved treatment response assessment tools are needed. We aimed to test the transferability of externally validated AI/radiomics biomarkers for predicting treatment response in advanced, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-breast cancer treated with xentuzumab, exemestane, and everolimus. Patient data from a phase Ib/II trial (May 2014-October 2016) were analyzed retrospectively. Eight imaging biomarkers (liver and overall tumor volume, two radiomics features representing tumor heterogeneity at both baseline and week 8) were validated for predicting clinical benefit using AUC analysis. An ancillary AI analysis developed a signature for predicting best overall response using 40 variables (3 clinical and 37 imaging) in the same cohort. Of 106 patients with data available for analysis, 28 had no clinical benefit from treatment (Group A) vs. 78 with clinical benefit (Group B). Seven of eight imaging biomarkers demonstrated significant predictive value. Participants in Group B exhibited significantly lower baseline and follow-up measures of liver and overall tumor volume, alongside marked changes in tumor heterogeneity by week 8. In our ancillary AI/radiomics model, the dominant drivers of prediction were changes in both liver tumor and overall tumor volume during treatment and the number of osteoblastic lesions on baseline bone scans. This cross-cancer proof-of-concept testing study supports the feasibility of applying multimodal AI/radiomics biomarkers to predict treatment response in advanced HR+, HER2- breast cancer, laying the foundation for broader pancancer and pantreatment applications pending further validation. NCT02123823.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive treatment technique for selected patients with primary liver tumors and liver-confined oligometastatic disease. Recently, SBRT has emerged as an alternative treatment option in non-surgical candidates and in whom percutaneous treatment methods are not possible or contraindicated. The experience with SBRT continues to grow. There are currently no imaging guidelines for assessment of tumor response and follow-up schedule following SBRT. SBRT produces characteristic radiation-induced changes in the treated tumor and surrounding liver parenchyma. Knowledge of these changes is essential in the interpretation of follow-up imaging and assessment of treatment response. In this review, we will describe the CT, MRI, and PET imaging findings following SBRT of both the targeted liver tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma.

Introduction:Percutaneous thermal ablation is widely adopted as a curative treatment approach for unresectable liver neoplasms. Accurate immediate assessment of therapeutic response post-ablation is critical to achieve favourable outcomes. The conventional technique of side-by-side comparison of pre- and post-ablation scans is challenging and hence there is a need for improved methods, which will accurately evaluate the immediate post-therapeutic response.Objectives and Significance:This review summarizes the findings of studies investigating the feasibility and efficacy of the fusion imaging systems in the immediate post-operative assessment of the therapeutic response to thermal ablation in liver neoplasms. The findings could potentially empower the clinicians with updated knowledge of the state-of-the-art in the assessment of treatment response for unresectable liver neoplasms.Methods and Analysis:A rapid review will be performed on publicly available major electronic databases to identify articles reporting the feasibility and efficacy of the fusion imaging systems in the immediate assessment of the therapeutic response to thermal ablation in liver neoplasms. The risk of bias and quality of articles will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 and Newcastle Ottawa tool.Ethics and Dissemination:Being a review, we do not anticipate the need for any approval from the Institutional Review Board. The outcomes of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.HighlightsEvaluation of the therapeutic response in liver neoplasms immediately post-ablation is critical to achieve favourable patient outcomes. We will examine the feasibility and technical efficacy of different fusion imaging systems in assessing the immediate treatment response post-ablation. The findings are expected to guide the clinicians with updated knowledge on the state-of-the-art when assessing the immediate treatment response for unresectable liver neoplasms.

Hepatic masses constitute about 5-6% of all intra-abdominal masses in children. The majority of liver tumors in children are malignant; these malignant liver tumors constitute the third most common intra-abdominal malignancy in the pediatric age group after Wilms' tumor and neuroblastoma. Only about one third of the liver tumors are benign. A differential diagnosis of liver tumors in children can be obtained based on the age of the child, clinical information (in particular AFP) and imaging characteristics. The purpose of this review is to report typical clinical and imaging characteristics of benign and malignant primary liver tumors in children.

Purpose: To compare the applicability of fusion imaging between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (CT/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging) and fusion imaging between CEUS and ultrasound (US-CEUS fusion imaging) in the assessment of treatment response during liver cancer ablation.Methods: From August to December 2015, patients who underwent US-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors at our hospital with available CT/MRI images were enrolled consecutively. Both CT/MRI-CEUS and US-CEUS fusion imaging were performed in all patients to evaluate treatment responses. The applicable rate, success rate of registration and duration time were recorded. Complications were monitored in the follow-up period, and CECT/MRI within three months were taken as the standard reference of technical efficacy.Results: A total of 157 liver tumors (19 ± 8 mm, range 8–55 mm) in 115 patients (54 ± 11 years old, range 2 7∼ 84 years old) were enrolled. The applicable rate of US-CEUS fusion imaging was 61.1% (96/157) because of inconspicuous lesions in US, lower than that of CT/MRI-CEUS fusion imaging (99.7% (155/157)) (p < .05). However, the success rate of registration in US-CEUS fusion imaging (93.8% (90/96)) was superior to that of CT/MRI-US fusion imaging (81.3% (126/155)) (p < .05), especially for cases combined with alternative preablation surgeries or procedures (p < .05). The technical efficacy rate was 99.3% (150/151) according to the CECT/CEMRI.Conclusions: Both CT/MRI-CEUS and US-CEUS fusion imaging are feasible means for intraprocedural immediate evaluation of treatment response for liver thermal ablation. US-CEUS fusion imaging is preferred because of its convenience and higher success rate of registration.

No. 539 Total burden of liver tumor: poor prognostic factor for survival and treatment response following Y90 radioembolization of hepatic metastases and cholangiocarcinoma

Intraoperative radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation for hepatic malignancies

The incidence of liver and pancreatic cancer is rising. Patients benefit from current treatments, but there are limitations in the evaluation of (early) response to treatment. Tumor metabolic alterations can be measured noninvasively with phosphorus (31 P) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). To conduct a quantitative analysis of the available literature on 31 P MRS performed in hepatopancreatobiliary cancer and to provide insight into its current and potential for therapy (non-) response assessment. Patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancer. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 31 P MRS. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched for studies published to 17 March 17, 2022. All 31 P MRS studies in hepatopancreatobiliary cancer reporting 31 P metabolite levels were included. Relative differences in 31 P metabolite levels/ratios between patients before therapy and healthy controls, and the relative changes in 31 P metabolite levels/ratios in patients before and after therapy were determined. The search yielded 10 studies, comprising 301 subjects, of whom 132 (44%) healthy volunteers and 169 (56%) patients with liver cancer of various etiology. To date, 31 P MRS has not been applied in pancreatic cancer. In liver cancer, alterations in levels of 31 P metabolites involved in cell proliferation (phosphomonoesters [PMEs] and phosphodiesters [PDEs]) and energy metabolism (ATP and inorganic phosphate [Pi]) were observed. In particular, liver tumors were associated with elevations of PME/PDE and PME/Pi compared to healthy liver tissue, although there was a broad variety among studies (elevations of 2%-267% and 21%-233%, respectively). Changes in PME/PDE in liver tumors upon therapy were substantial, yet very heterogeneous and both decreases and increases were observed, whereas PME/Pi was consistently decreased after therapy in all studies (-13% to -76%). 31 P MRS has great potential for treatment monitoring in oncology. Future studies are needed to correlate the changes in 31 P metabolite levels in hepatopancreatobiliary tumors with treatment response. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, and if left untreated, one of the most lethal. Ablative therapies including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) play increasingly important role for patients with liver tumors who are not surgical candidates. Monitoring treatment response following ablation is crucial in oncologic imaging. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can assess changes in tumor vascularity and perfusion while subtraction imaging is useful in differentiating residual tumor from post-ablation parenchymal changes. The aim of this study is to compare the role of subtraction MRI and conventional dynamic MRI in assessing treatment response following RFA in patients with HCC.ResultsThe study included 48 patients with 62 HCC lesions who underwent RFA from May to October 2020, followed by MRI evaluation with 1-month interval. Two readers with experience in hepatic imaging interpreted the dynamic and subtraction dynamic MRI. The hepatic focal lesions were classified into “well-ablated” and “residual” groups according to MRI findings, and the agreement between the two readers was evaluated. Using dynamic MRI, the first reader reported 38 well-ablated lesions, and the second reader agreed in 34 of them (89.5%). Residual disease was reported by the first reader in 22 lesions and the second reader disagreed in 10 of them (45.5%) where complete ablation was reported. Thirty-eight out 44 well-ablated lesions (86.4%) showed high signal intensity on non-enhanced T1 images, and 28 lesion (63.6%) showed intermediate T2 signal. All the mis-matched readings occurred in lesions with a high signal intensity in pre-contrast T1 images. Moderate agreement between the two readers was found with Kappa value of 0.467. Significant additive value of subtraction technique to dynamic MRI was detected with a P value of 0.009. No major complications recorded except for a single case of major portal vein branch occlusion.ConclusionMRI is a powerful imaging tool in assessing tumor viability and complications after RFA in patients with HCC. Dynamic MRI study is the gold standard in detecting recurrent lesions while subtraction technique is crucial in differentiating between arterial enhancement due to residual disease and normal hyperintense T1 signal of the ablation zone.

Liver tumors exhibit significant heterogeneity in etiology, pathology, and treatment response, making accurate differential diagnosis critical for diagnosis and management. While multi-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) provides valuable imaging patterns for differentiation, visual assessment alone is often limited by overlapping features. To address this, we present MCT-LTDiag, a comprehensive Multi-phase CT dataset for Liver Tumor Diagnosis, comprising 517 cases with four-phase contrast-enhancedCT scans (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases) and five tumor subtypes: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM), and hepatic hemangioma (HH). The dataset features standardized preprocessing, rigorous quality control, and expert-annotated tumor masks. Baseline experiments using radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning models demonstrate the dataset's utility, with multi-phase integration significantly improving diagnostic performance. MCT-LTDiag serves as a benchmark for advancing automated liver tumor subtype classification and is publicly available to support future research.

Historically, radiation therapy was not considered in treatment of liver tumors owing to the risk of radiation-induced liver disease. However, development of highly conformed radiation treatments such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased use of radiation therapy in the liver. SBRT is indicated in treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors with outcomes comparable to those of other local therapies, especially in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. After SBRT, imaging features of the tumor and surrounding background hepatic parenchyma demonstrate a predictable pattern immediately after treatment and during follow-up. The goals of SBRT are to deliver a lethal radiation dose to the targeted liver tumor and to minimize radiation dose to normal liver parenchyma and other adjacent organs. Evaluation of tumor response after SBRT centers on changes in size and enhancement; however, these changes are often delayed secondary to the underlying physiologic effects of radiation. Knowledge of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of SBRT should allow better understanding of the typical imaging features in detection of tumor response and avoid misinterpretation from common pitfalls and atypical imaging findings. Imaging features of radiation-induced change in the surrounding liver parenchyma are characterized by a focal liver reaction that can potentially be mistaken for no response or recurrence of tumor. Knowledge of the pattern and chronology of this phenomenon may allay any uncertainty in assessment of tumor response. Other pitfalls related to fiducial marker placement or combination therapies are important to recognize. The authors review the basic principles of SBRT and illustrate post-SBRT imaging features of treated liver tumors and adjacent liver parenchyma with a focus on avoiding pitfalls in imaging evaluation of response. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

With the rapidly evolving field of image-guided tumor ablation, there is an increasing demand and need for tools to optimize treatment success. Known factors affecting the success of (non-)thermal liver ablation procedures are the ability to optimize tumor and surrounding critical structure visualization, ablation applicator targeting, and ablation zone confirmation. A recent study showed superior local tumor progression-free survival and local control outcomes when using transcatheter computed tomography hepatic angiography (CTHA) guidance in percutaneous liver ablation procedures. This pictorial review provides eight clinical cases from three institutions, MD Anderson (Houston, TX, USA), Gustave Roussy (Paris, France), and Amsterdam UMC (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), with the intent to demonstrate the added value of real-time CTHA guided tumor ablation for primary liver tumors and liver-only metastatic disease. The clinical illustrations highlight the ability to improve the detectability of the initial target liver tumor(s) and identify surrounding critical vascular structures, detect 'vanished' and/or additional tumors intraprocedurally, differentiate local tumor progression from non-enhancing scar tissue, and promptly detect and respond to iatrogenic hemorrhagic events. Although at the cost of adding a minor but safe intervention, CTHA-guided liver tumor ablation minimizes complications of the actual ablation procedure, reduces the number of repeat ablations, and improves the oncological outcome of patients with liver malignancies. Therefore, we recommend adopting CTHA as a potential quality-improving guiding method within the (inter)national standards of practice.

Percutaneous microwave ablation of liver tumours is a well-established technique that has been proven to be effective in the curative and palliative treatment of small volume primary and secondary liver tumours. Microwave ablation is designed to achieve larger areas of necrosis compared to radiofrequency ablation and has a good safety profile among liver tumour treatments. Mortality is unreported and major complications are rare. Knowledge of potential complications is essential for interventional radiologists performing liver ablation in order to reduce patient morbidity. The aim of this review is to illustrate major complications post microwave ablation in a pictorial format as well as a discussion on how best to avoid these complications.

Liver tumors in children are uncommon and show remarkable morphologic heterogeneity. Pediatric tumors may arise from either the epithelial or mesenchymal component of the liver and rarely may also show both lines of differentiation. Both benign and malignant liver tumors have been reported in children. The most common pediatric liver tumors by age are benign hepatic infantile hemangiomas in neonates and infants, malignant hepatoblastoma in infants and toddlers, and malignant hepatocellular carcinoma in teenagers. Here, we provide an up-to-date review of pediatric liver tumors. We discuss the clinical presentation, imaging findings, pathology, and relevant molecular features that can help in the correct identification of these tumors, which is important in managing these children.