Abstract

Continuous baseflow separation procedures have been frequently used to differentiate total flows into the high-frequency, lowamplitude 'baseflow' component and the low-frequency, high-amplitude 'flood' flows. In the past, such procedures have normally been applied to streamflow time-series data with time steps of 1 day or less. However, there are applications in South Africa (notably related to setting instream flow requirements) where the only available data for natural flow conditions are monthly flow volumes. A relatively experienced hydrologist can be expected to successfully calibrate a separation model using daily data, coupled with a conceptual understanding of the hydrological processes prevailing in the catchment. The same cannot be said for monthly data, as the majority of the information on short-term flow variability has been lost. As part of a regional study covering the whole of South Africa, this paper presents some example results of comparisons between daily and monthly separations. While it can be concluded that it is possible to determine regionalised parameters for monthly data separations that are useful, further information on the processes involved would be of great value to validate the methods and parameter values. This information could also form the basis for the further development of baseflow separation methods for South African flow regimes. Water SA Vol.29(1) 2003: 43-48

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.