Continua of Logics Related to Intuitionistic and Minimal Logics

A Survey of Some Connections Between Classical, Intuitionistic and Minimal Logic

Two algebraic structures, the contrapositionally complemented Heyting algebra (ccHa) and the contrapositionally $\vee $ complemented Heyting algebra (c$\vee $cHa), are studied. The salient feature of these algebras is that there are two negations, one intuitionistic and another minimal in nature, along with a condition connecting the two operators. Properties of these algebras are discussed, examples are given and comparisons are made with relevant algebras. Intuitionistic Logic with Minimal Negation (ILM) corresponding to ccHas and its extension ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$ for c$\vee $cHas are then investigated. Besides its relations with intuitionistic and minimal logics, ILM is observed to be related to Peirce’s logic and Vakarelov’s logic MIN. With a focus on properties of the two negations, relational semantics for ILM and ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$ are obtained with respect to four classes of frames, and inter-translations between the classes preserving truth and validity are provided. ILM and ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$ are shown to have the finite model property with respect to these classes of frames and proved to be decidable. Extracting features of the two negations in the algebras, a further investigation is made, following logical studies of negations that define the operators independently of the binary operator of implication. Using Dunn’s logical framework for the purpose, two logics $K_{im}$ and $K_{im-{\vee }}$ are discussed, where the language does not include implication. The $K_{im}$-algebras are reducts of ccHas and are different from relevant algebraic structures having two negations. The negations in the $K_{im}$-algebras and $K_{im-{\vee }}$-algebras are shown to occupy distinct positions in an enhanced form of Dunn’s kite of negations. Relational semantics for $K_{im}$ and $K_{im-{\vee }}$ is provided by a class of frames that are based on Dunn’s compatibility frames. It is observed that this class coincides with one of the four classes giving the relational semantics for ILM and ${\textrm {ILM}}$-${\vee }$.

Minimal logic, i.e., intuitionistic logic without the ex falso principle, is investigated in its original form with a negation symbol instead of a symbol denoting the contradiction. A Kripke semantics is developed for minimal logic and its sublogics with a still weaker negation by introducing a function on the upward closed sets of the models. The basic logic is a logic in which the negation has no properties but the one of being a unary operator. A number of extensions is studied of which the most important ones are contraposition logic and negative ex falso, a weak form of the ex falso principle. Completeness is proved, and the created semantics is further studied. The negative translation of classical logic into intuitionistic logic is made part of a chain of translations by introducing translations from minimal logic into contraposition logic and intuitionistic logic into minimal logic, the latter having been discovered in the correspondence between Johansson and Heyting. Finally, as a bridge to the work of Franco Montagna a start is made of a study of linear models of these logics.

In this paper it is shown that every intermediate logic obtained from intuitionistic logic by adding a disjunction can be normalized. However, the normalization procedure is not as complete as that for intuitionistic and minimal logic because some results which usually follow from normalization fail, including the separation property and the subformula property. However, in a few special cases, we can extend the normalization process to obtain new consistency proofs.

In this work, we focus on the study of the algebra of strong subobjects obtained from a category of rough sets that forms a quasitopos. A new algebraic structure called ‘contrapositionally complemented pseudo Boolean algebra’ is obtained and its basic properties studied. The corresponding logic ‘intuitionistic logic with minimal negation’ is introduced, and its connection with the intuitionistic and minimal logics is discussed.

Intuitionistic logic formalises the foundational ideas of L.E.J. Brouwer’s mathematical programme of intuitionism. It is one of the earliest non-classical logics, and the difference between classical and intuitionistic logic may be interpreted to lie in the law of the excluded middle, which asserts that either a proposition is true or its negation is true. This principle is deemed unacceptable from the constructive point of view, in whose understanding the law means that there is an effective procedure to determine the truth of all propositions. This understanding of the distinction between the two logics supports the view that negation plays a vital role in the formulation of intuitionistic logic.Nonetheless, the formalisation of negation in intuitionistic logic has not been universally accepted, and many alternative accounts of negation have been proposed. Some seek to weaken or strengthen the negation, and others actively supporting negative inferences that are impossible with it.This thesis follows this tradition and investigates various aspects of negation in intuitionistic logic. Firstly, we look at a problem proposed by H. Ishihara, which asks how effectively one can conserve the deducibility of classical theorems into intuitionistic logic, by assuming atomic classes of non-constructive principles. The classes given in this section improve a previous class given by K. Ishii in two respects: (a) instead of a single class for the law of the excluded middle, two classes are given in terms of weaker principles, allowing a finer analysis and (b) the conservation now extends to a subsystem of intuitionistic logic called Glivenko’s logic. This section also discusses the extension of Ishihara’s problem to minimal logic.Secondly, we study the relationship between two frameworks for weak constructive negation, the approach of D. Vakarelov on one hand and the framework of subminimal negation by A. Colacito, D. de Jongh, and A. L. Vargas on the other hand. We capture a version of Vakarelov’s logic with the semantics of the latter framework, and clarify the relationship between the two semantics. This also provides proof-theoretic insights, which results in the formulation of a cut-free sequent calculus for the aforementioned system.Thirdly, we investigate the ways to unify the formalisations of some logics with contra-intuitionistic inferences. The enquiry concerns paraconsistent logics by R. Sylvan and A. B. Gordienko, as well as the logic of co-negation by G. Priest and of empirical negation by M. De and H. Omori. We take Sylvan’s system as basic, and formulate the frame conditions of the defining axioms of the other systems. The conditions are then used to obtain cut-free labelled sequent calculi for the systems.Finally, we consider L. Humberstone’s actuality operator for intuitionistic logic, which can be seen as the dualisation of a contra-intuitionistic negation. A compete axiomatisation of intuitionistic logic with actuality operator is given, and comparisons are made for some related operators.Abstract prepared by Satoru Niki.E-mail:Satoru.Niki@rub.de

We show that intuitionistic propositional logic is Carnap categorical: the only interpretation of the connectives consistent with the intuitionistic consequence relation is the standard interpretation. This holds with respect to the most well-known semantics relative to which intuitionistic logic is sound and complete; among them Kripke semantics, Beth semantics, Dragalin semantics, topological semantics, and algebraic semantics. These facts turn out to be consequences of an observation about interpretations in Heyting algebras.

Algorithmic correspondence and canonicity for non-distributive logics

The article discusses minimal temporal logic systems built on the basis of classical logic as well as intuitionistic logic. The constructions of these systems are discussed as well as their basic properties. The K t system was discussed as the minimal temporal logic system built based on classical logic, while the IK t system and its modification were discussed as the minimal temporal logic system built based on intuitionistic logic.

Substructural logics are traditionally obtained by dropping some or all of the structural rules from Gentzen's sequent calculi LK or LJ. It is well known that the usual logical connectives then split into more than one connective. Alternatively, one can start with the (intuitionistic) Lambek calculus, which contains these multiple connectives, and obtain numerous logics like: exponential-free linear logic, relevant logic, BCK logic, and intuitionistic logic, in an incremental way. Each of these logics also has a classical counterpart, and some also have a 'cyclic' counterpart. These logics have been studied extensively and are quite well understood. Generalising further, one can start with intuitionistic Bi-Lambek logic, which contains the dual of every connective from the Lambek calculus. The addition of the structural rules then gives Bi-linear, Bi-relevant, Bi-BCK and Bi-intuitionistic logic, again in an incremental way. Each of these logics also has a classical counterpart, and some even have a 'cyclic' counterpart. These (bi-intuitionistic and bi-classical) extensions of Bi-Lambek logic are not so well understood. Cut-elimination for Classical Bi-Lambek logic, for example, is not completely clear since some cut rules have side conditions requiring that certain constituents be empty or non-empty. The display logic of Nuel Belnap is a general Gentzen-style proof theoretical framework designed to capture many different logics in one uniform setting. The beauty of display logic is a general cut-elimination theorem, due to Belnap, which applies whenever the rules of the display calculus obey certain, easily checked, conditions. The original display logic, and its various incarnations, are not suitable for capturing bi-intuitionistic and bi-classical logics in a uniform way. We remedy this situation by giving a single (cut-free) Display calculus for the Bi-Lambek Calculus, from which all the well-known (bi-intuitionistic and bi-classical) extensions are obtained by the incremental addition of structural rules to a constant core of logical introduction rules. We highlight the inherent duality and symmetry within this framework obtaining 'four proofs for the price of one'. We give algebraic semantics for the Bi-Lambek logics and prove that our calculi are sound and complete with respect to these semantics. We show how to define an alternative display calculus for bi-classical substructural logics using negations, instead of implications, as primitives. Borrowing from other display calculi, we show how to extend our display calculus to handle bi-intuitionistic or bi-classical substructural logics containing the forward and backward modalities familiar from tense logic, the exponentials of linear logic, the converse operator familiar from relation algebra, four negations, and two unusual modalities corresponding to the non-classical analogues of Sheffer's 'dagger' and 'stroke', all in a modular way. Using the Gaggle Theory of Dunn we outline relational semantics for the binary and unary intensional connectives, but make no attempt to do so for the extensional connectives, or the exponentials. Finally, we flesh out a suggestion of Lambek to embed intuitionistic logic using two unusual 'exponentials', and show that these 'exponentials' are essentially tense logical modalities, quite at odds with the usual exponentials. Using a refinement of the display property, you can pick and choose from these possibilities to construct a display calculus for your needs. Keywords:display logic, substructural logics, linear logic, relevant logic, BCK-logic, bi-Heyting logic, intuitionistic substructural tense logics, intuitionistic modal logics, proof theory, gaggle theory

On the one hand, classical logic is an extremely successful theory, even if\nnot being perfect. On the other hand, intuitionistic logic is, without a doubt,\none of the most important non-classical logics. But, how can proponents of one\nlogic view the other logic? In this paper, we focus on one of the directions,\nnamely how classicists can view intuitionistic logic. To this end, we introduce\nan expansion of positive intuitionistic logic, both semantically and\nproof-theoretically, and establish soundness and strong completeness. Moreover,\nwe discuss the interesting status of disjunction, and the possibility of\ncombining classical logic and minimal logic. We also compare our system with\nthe system of Caleiro and Ramos.\n

We study how to postpone the application of the reductio ad absurdum rule ( $$\mathsf {raa}$$ ) in classical natural deduction. This technique is connected with two normalization strategies for classical logic, due to Prawitz and Seldin, respectively. We introduce a variant of Seldin’s strategy for the postponement of $$\mathsf {raa}$$ , which induces a negative translation (a variant of Kuroda’s one) from classical to intuitionistic and minimal logic. Through this translation, Glivenko’s theorem from classical to intuitionistic and minimal logic is proven.

Constructive logic with Nelson negation is an extension of the intuitionistic logic with a special type of negation expressing some features of constructive falsity and refutation by counterexample. In this paper we generalize this logic weakening maximally the underlying intuitionistic negation. The resulting system, called subminimal logic with Nelson negation, is studied by means of a kind of algebras called generalized N-lattices. We show that generalized N-lattices admit representation formalizing the intuitive idea of refutation by means of counterexamples giving in this way a counterexample semantics of the logic in question and some of its natural extensions. Among the extensions which are near to the intuitionistic logic are the minimal logic with Nelson negation which is an extension of the Johansson's minimal logic with Nelson negation and its in a sense dual version — the co-minimal logic with Nelson negation. Among the extensions near to the classical logic are the well known 3-valued logic of Lukasiewicz, two 12-valued logics and one 48-valued logic. Standard questions for all these logics — decidability, Kripke-style semantics, complete axiomatizability, conservativeness are studied. At the end of the paper extensions based on a new connective of self-dual conjunction and an analog of the Lukasiewicz middle value ½ have also been considered.

In this work, an intuitionistic propositional logic with a Galois connection (IntGC) is introduced. In addition to the intuitionistic logic axioms and inference rule of modus ponens, the logic contains only two rules of inference mimicking the performance of Galois connections. Both Kripke-style and algebraic semantics are presented for IntGC, and IntGC is proved to be complete with respect to both of these semantics. We show that IntGC has the finite model property and is decidable, but Glivenko’s Theorem does not hold. Duality between algebraic and Kripke semantics is presented, and a representation theorem for Heyting algebras with Galois connections is proved. In addition, an application to rough L-valued sets is presented.

In this thesis we consider generic tools and techniques for the proof-theoretic investigation of not necessarily normal modal logics based on minimal, intuitionistic or classical propositional logic. The underlying framework is that of ordinary symmetric or asymmetric two-sided sequent calculi without additional structural connectives, and the point of interest are the logical rules in such a system. We introduce the format of a sequent rule with context restrictions and the slightly weaker format of a shallow rule. The format of a rule with context restrictions is expressive enough to capture most normal modal logics in the S5 cube, standard systems for minimal, intuitionistic and classical propositional logic and a wide variety of non-normal modal logics. For systems given by such rules we provide sufficient criteria for cut elimination and decidability together with generic complexity results. We also explore the expressivity of such systems with the cut rule in terms of axioms in a Hilbert-style system by exhibiting a corresponding syntactically defined class of axioms along with automatic translations between axioms and rules. This enables us to show a number of limitative results concerning amongst others the modal logic S5. As a step towards a generic construction of cut free and tractable sequent calculi we then introduce the notion of cut trees as representations of rules constructed by absorbing cuts. With certain limitations this allows the automatic construction of a cut free and tractable sequent system from a finite number of rules. For cases where such a system is to be constructed by hand we introduce a graphical representation of rules with context restrictions which simplifies this process. Finally, we apply the developed tools and techniques and construct new cut free sequent systems for a number of Lewis’ conditional logics extending the logic V. The systems yield purely syntactic decision procedures of optimal complexity and proofs of the Craig interpolation property for the logics at hand.